Analysis Complete for House Bill 1681

Office of Financial Management

Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.

Bookmark and Share

You are receiving this email as a subscriber to the Initiative 960 email list. RCW 43.135.031 (I-960) requires that notices be sent each time a bill that raises taxes or fees is: introduced in either house; scheduled for a public hearing; approved by any legislative committee; or passed by either house of the Legislature.

Please note: This email message was sent from a notification-only address. Please do not reply to this message.

HB 1681, titled AN ACT Relating to funding the working families tax exemption by imposing a surcharge on publicly traded companies providing excessive executive compensation, 10 year analysis is complete.

The Office of Financial Management has identified this bill as requiring a ten-year projection of increased cost to the taxpayers or affected fee payers.

Ten-year projection:

Fiscal
Year

   B&O tax surcharge

   Public utility tax surcharge

Total

 

2020

$ 21,800,000

$ 135,000

$ 21,935,000

2021

54,400,000

334,000

$ 54,734,000

2022

56,600,000

346,000

$ 56,946,000

2023

59,000,000

358,000

$ 59,358,000

2024

62,100,000

370,000

$ 62,470,000

2025

65,200,000

384,000

$ 65,584,000

2026

68,500,000

397,000

$ 68,897,000

2027

72,000,000

411,000

$ 72,411,000

2028

75,700,000

425,000

$ 76,125,000

2029

79,600,000

440,000

$ 80,040,000

Total:

$ 614,900,000

$ 3,600,000

$ 618,500,000




ESD is not responsible for collecting any taxes or fees to administer this program. In order to conduct an effective ten-year projection, there is a requirement to obtain data that ESD is unable to procure given the time constraints of this analysis.

 

 

First, data on CEO pay as a ratio of employee median income would need to be pulled from Dodd-Frank filings. Data would need to be extracted from filings from each of the state's nearly-8,000 companies that file with the SEC. Given enough time, a data pull of this nature could accurately project the number of CEOs that meet the criteria described in Sec. 3 of the bill.

 

 

Second, data related to each company's tax liability under chapter 82.16 RCW is necessary. The Department of Revenue likely has access to this data, but a sharing agreement would need to be established between the two agencies for the purposes of this analysis.

 

 

Once access to these data sets is available, an effective ten-year analysis may be conducted by ESD.