Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Claims Processing Training and Guidance Need Improvement

Bookmark and Share

Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.

You are subscribed to Oversight Reports for Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General (OIG). This information has recently been updated, and is now available.

Given VA's phased reopening efforts for its administrations and offices to return to more routine operations, the OIG has resumed its standard publication release practices as well. The release of reports was limited during March through June 22, 2020, in recognition of VA's need to focus on the initial pandemic response. The OIG will remain sensitive to the burdens that may be imposed on VA to respond to additional COVID-19 cases, and will continually assess its report release policy as circumstances warrant.

 

12/08/2020 07:00 PM EST

In 2018, the VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) reported that nearly half of disability benefit claims that were denied service connection for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and were related to military sexual trauma were not processed properly. In contrast, this review focuses on PTSD claims that were unrelated to military sexual trauma. Most PTSD claims fall into this category. To decide that a veteran is eligible for disability benefits, claim processors for the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) must establish a connection between the disability and the veteran’s military service. The review team found that claims processors inaccurately processed about 18,300 of 118,000 PTSD claims completed in fiscal year 2019 (16 percent). Most errors occurred because claims processors did not verify or ask veterans to provide the disorder’s cause, known as an in-service stressor. In other cases, claims processors did not request a medical examination, medical opinion, or clarification of inconsistencies in the examination as required. Claims processors made these errors because they did not fully understand PTSD stressor types and the stressor verification process. VBA’s Compensation Service did not mandate any national training for claims processors on these subjects except during the first year in the position. In addition, VBA’s procedures manual was not effectively organized to allow staff to locate this information and lacked specific guidance for some aspects of PTSD claim processing. The OIG recommended that the under secretary for benefits determine the actions needed to ensure staff understand the requirements for gathering evidence and verifying stressor requirements for PTSD claims and, once the actions are implemented, monitor the results to ensure effectiveness. VBA should also assess whether its adjudication procedures manual needs to be reorganized and amended to help staff process PTSD claims accurately.