|
Patent Trial and Appeal Board |
|
USPTO designates as precedential an Appeals Review Panel decision addressing obviousness-type double patenting
Ex parte Baurin, Appeal 2024-002920 (ARP Aug. 6, 2026) (precedential)
In this decision, an Appeals Review Panel (ARP) of Director John A. Squires, Chief Judge Kalyan Deshpande, and Acting Deputy Chief Judge Michelle Ankenbrand reversed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision and reinstated the examiner’s rejection of claims for obviousness-type double patenting (OTDP). The ARP explained the statutory, precedential, and supporting commercial rationales underlying OTDP and determined that the Federal Circuit has recognized an anti-harassment rationale as a legitimate policy justification underpinning the OTDP doctrine, even absent evidence that patent issuance would extend the duration of an applicant’s patent monopoly. The ARP, nonetheless, questioned whether a standalone anti-harassment rationale risks harming innovation and should be ultimately reconsidered by the court. The ARP also proposed a future framework designed to streamline and make more predictable the Office’s handling of OTDP.
Learn more about PTAB precedential and informative decisions.
|
|
|
Having trouble accessing links in this email? Your email server security software may be altering the links. Contact your IT or email administrator and ask them to "allow-list" links-1.govdelivery.com and links-2.govdelivery.com to ensure you can access all content in this communication.
Stay connected with the USPTO by subscribing to regular email updates. Visit our subscription center at www.uspto.gov/subscribe to update or change your email preferences.
This email was sent from an unmonitored mailbox. To contact us, please visit our website www.uspto.gov/about/contacts. To ensure that you continue to receive our news and notices, please modify your email filters to allow mail from subscriptioncenter@subscriptions.uspto.gov.
|
|
|
|
