|
Patent Trial and Appeal Board |
|
USPTO designates as informative a decision addressing real party in interest
In this decision, the Director vacated the decisions granting institution and denied inter partes review after concluding that a petitioner’s failure to provide clarity as to its actual identity proved fatal to its petitions. The Director found that the patent owner came forward with evidence sufficient to put into dispute whether the petitions identified all real parties in interest (RPIs) and the petitioner failed to rebut that evidence and carry its burden to show that it had, in fact, named all RPIs.
Learn more about precedential and informative decisions.
|
|
|
Having trouble accessing links in this email? Your email server security software may be altering the links. Contact your IT or email administrator and ask them to "allow-list" links-1.govdelivery.com and links-2.govdelivery.com to ensure you can access all content in this communication.
Stay connected with the USPTO by subscribing to regular email updates. Visit our subscription center at www.uspto.gov/subscribe to update or change your email preferences.
This email was sent from an unmonitored mailbox. To contact us, please visit our website www.uspto.gov/about/contacts. To ensure that you continue to receive our news and notices, please modify your email filters to allow mail from subscriptioncenter@subscriptions.uspto.gov.
|
|
|
|
