Apple Inc. v. Fintiv, Inc., IPR2020-00019, Paper 11 (March 20, 2020) (precedential)
This order discusses six factors the Board considers in determining whether to exercise its discretion to institute review when there is a related proceeding pending in district court.
Oracle Corp. v. Click-to-Call Techs. LP, IPR2013-00312, Paper 26 (Oct. 30, 2013)
This decision has been de-designated in view of the Board’s Precedential Opinion Panel (POP) decision in GoPro, Inc. v. 360Heros, Inc., IPR2018-01734, Paper 38 at 8-9 (PTAB Aug. 23, 2019).
Learn more about precedential and informative decisions on the USPTO website.
|