|
The Data Spotlight is an occasional update series focusing on how researchers are using restricted-use datasets for evidence-building. In this issue, the Spotlight describes how researchers are using confidential data from the U.S. Census Bureau under a data-sharing agreement with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to understand the effects of housing mobility among low-income families.
The Moving to Opportunity (MTO) dataset, which has become a valuable resource for studying the consequences of neighborhood poverty, resulted from a unique random assignment research effort sponsored by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The data allow researchers to investigate the impacts of poverty for key outcomes including employment, income, and educational attainment. This demonstration was designed to help very low–income families with children living in public housing or Section 8 project–based housing in extremely poor neighborhoods relocate to "opportunity neighborhoods" for greater self-sufficiency and improved individual and family well-being.
The MTO demonstration ran in five large cities—Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York—between September 1994 and August 1998. The restricted-access version of the MTO dataset is housed in the U.S. Census Bureau under a data-sharing agreement with HUD and can be accessed through the Federal Statistical Research Data Centers. MTO data can be linked to Census Bureau data such as the American Community Survey.
Several projects are using MTO and Census data, including a study of the long-term effects of housing mobility on civic and political participation (David Knight, Columbia University), which examines the impact of housing mobility on electoral participation. Read more about the study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, “Residential Mobility and Persistently Depressed Voting Among Disadvantaged Adults in a Large Housing Experiment.” Another project analyzes the influence of a housing voucher experiment and neighborhood context on mortality, fertility, housing, family formation, and demographic outcomes after 30 years (Theresa Osypuk, University of Minnesota). A recent paper, “Does Poor Health Influence Residential Selection? Understanding Mobility among Low-Income Housing Voucher Recipients in the Moving to Opportunity Study,” examined the links between health and housing mobility.
For more information on requesting the MTO data, visit ResearchDataGov.org.
|
|
|
The National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) is one of three recognized statistical agencies and units (RSAUs) in the U.S. Department of Agriculture. For more than 150 years, NASS has been known for its expertise, its data quality, its contributions to statistical science, and its commitment to publishing agricultural data that can be used in multiple ways. Researchers incorporating NASS data can track trends, best practices, and patterns of behavior as well as analyze consumer demand or calculate risk levels for lending programs. Other USDA agencies use NASS data to provide services and support to farm and community programs throughout the nation.
A wide range of researchers, analysts, and other professionals use NASS data to answer challenging questions on such topics as crop management, chemical pesticides, land usage, and veterinary science. They also use NASS data to align their work with industry needs, so they can advance their individual fields of study in meaningful ways. Many researchers use NASS data to augment their own data collection efforts, to apply for grants, and to establish education and extension programs that are appropriate for the needs and opportunities revealed by the data. Their research can result in producer benefits such as improved crop yields, new technologies, and establishment of new programs.
To help answer these questions, the SAP Data Catalog includes nearly 20 NASS data assets available for research, such as the Census of Agriculture (COA), the Agricultural Resource Management Survey, and many COA special studies such as the Irrigation and Water Management Survey. NASS began releasing 2022 COA products on February 13, 2024, and is excited to announce that the restricted microdata will be added to the SAP Data Catalog in August 2024. The COA is a comprehensive summary of agricultural activity for the United States and for each state and county. It includes the number of farms by size and type, inventory and values for crops and livestock, producer characteristics, and much more. Because of the size and scope of this dataset, applicants are required to select from a variable list as part of the SAP application.
NASS reviews SAP applications year-round. Applications for NASS-owned datasets will have a determination returned within 12 weeks. Some datasets are jointly owned by NASS and another USDA statistical agency or unit, and a determination for applications involving these datasets will be returned within 24 weeks.
Currently, researchers are using datasets available in the SAP to evaluate a variety of interesting topics, such as the impact of climate and the environment on agriculture, the vital economic role of various agricultural industry sectors, and best practices for producers; and promote their adoption. One specific project focuses on how water delivery organizations and individual producers adapt to water scarcity, which poses a threat to the resilience of many sectors of the U.S. economy, including agriculture.
For years, NASS has made restricted microdata available to researchers, but the SAP has formalized and added transparency to the process. For additional information about access to NASS’s restricted microdata, visit the NASS restricted microdata access website and review the Data Lab Handbook and SAP Application Guidelines.
|
|
|
RESOURCES: New User Materials |
|
New learning resources for SAP applicants and reviewers have been added to the SAP website’s Learning Resources page.
|
|
Applicant Checklist (one-pager)
Not sure how to start an SAP application? Our checklist breaks down each step in the process, from searching the metadata to submitting and tracking your application. Start your SAP journey today!
|
|
|
Reviewer Checklist (one-pager)
Reviewing an SAP application is a multi-step process. The clock is ticking! Complete your SAP review in a timely manner with this step-by-step checklist.
|
Don’t see what you are looking for? Email us at singleportal@nsf.gov and share your ideas about future topics for SAP User Materials.
For more information about the SAP, visit the FAQs on the SAP informational website and on the SAP portal. A complete list of SAP terms and definitions is available from the SAP Glossary. The SAP User Guide provides detailed guidance for preparing an application.
|
|
|
|
If you are interested in applying for access to confidential data via the SAP, you should first determine if public data can provide the information you need. To search available public data, visit data.gov or statistical agency websites. The SAP Data Catalog also indicates if a public-use version of a confidential dataset is available. |
|
|
The IRS Statistics of Income program’s (SOI) application window is now closed. Details about future application windows for IRS data from SOI can be found in each dataset's metadata on the SAP portal or on SOI’s Joint Statistical Research Program website.
For more information on SOI’s products and programs, please visit irs.gov/statistics or e-mail our Statistical Information Services Office at SIS@irs.gov.
|
|
Share Your Research!
Do you have a paper or presentation using SAP data? If so, contact your data-providing agency about having it potentially highlighted in a future newsletter.
|
|
|
ABOUT THE STANDARD APPLICATION PROCESS
The Standard Application Process (SAP) is a common application for applying for access to confidential data from across federal statistical agencies and units. The SAP is an important part of federal efforts to promote the use of data for evidence-building purposes and is governed by policies established by the Interagency Council on Statistical Policy.
Participating Agencies
|
|
|
|
|