|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE May 14, 2025
Insurance Auto Auctions to Pay $175,000 in EEOC Racial Harassment Lawsuit
Settles Federal Suit Charging Yard Attendant Faced Harassment by Co-Worker
FREMONT, Calif. — Vehicle auctioneer Insurance Auto Auctions, Inc. will pay $175,000 and provide injunctive relief to resolve a racial harassment lawsuit brought by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency announced today.
According to the EEOC, a black yard worker faced racial harassment, including repeated racial slurs, by co-workers. Local managers were aware of the misconduct, but either ignored it or otherwise failed to take adequate steps to address it. The lawsuit also said that the employee was eventually forced to quit over the racial harassment.
Such alleged conduct violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits racial harassment and requires employers to take prompt action to investigate and stop the misconduct after they receive notice of it. After first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through conciliation, the EEOC filed its lawsuit (EEOC v Insurance Auto Auctions, Inc., Case No.: 3:24-CV-06848-TSH) in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Under the three-year decree settling the suit, Auto Auctions will pay $175,000 to the former employee and implement additional policies and procedures to bolster its compliance with Title VII; these include trainings for supervisors and managers on investigative techniques for racial harassment investigations.
“The EEOC commends Auto Auctions’ new ownership for its cooperation in resolving this case early in the lawsuit even though the harassment predated its involvement,” said Christopher Green, district director of the EEOC’s San Francisco District Office. “This settlement provides fair compensation for the employee, and long-awaited closure for both the worker and the company.”
EEOC Regional Attorney Roberta Steele said, “Employers must ensure that the supervisors they empower to enforce anti-employment discrimination policies actually do so. Failing to comply with equal employment opportunity laws can be costly.”
In fiscal year 2024, the EEOC recovered over $60 million for violations of Title VII involving racial harassment. For more information on harassment, please visit https://www.eeoc.gov/harassment.
The EEOC’s San Francisco District has jurisdiction over Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Northern California, Northern Nevada and Washington.
The EEOC is the sole federal agency authorized to investigate and litigate against businesses and other private sector employers for violations of federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. For public sector employers, the EEOC shares jurisdiction with the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division; the EEOC is responsible for investigating charges against state and local government employers before referring them to DOJ for potential litigation. The EEOC also is responsible for coordinating the federal government’s employment antidiscrimination effort. More information about the EEOC is available at www.eeoc.gov. Stay connected with the latest EEOC news by subscribing to our email updates.
###
Please contact newsroom@eeoc.gov for media inquiries.
| Contact: |
| Christopher Green, District Director (650) 684-0931 |
| Roberta Steele, Regional Attorney (650) 684-0939 |
| Marcia L. Mitchell, Assistant Regional Attorney (650) 684-0934 |
| EEOC San Francisco District Office |
| 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 500W, San Francisco, CA |
| |
| Office of Communications & Legislative Affairs |
| 131 M Street NE |
| Washington, DC 20507 |
| newsroom@eeoc.gov |
| ASL videophone 844-234-5122 |
EEOC Hosts July Webinar on Accommodations and Retaliation
 “Frontline Supervisors, Accommodation, and Retaliation” QR code for http://bit.ly/SuperAccomm
Train your supervisors on how to handle requests for accommodation for religion, disability and pregnancy!
- Will an applicant's religious garb conflict with the company dress code?
- Can a new hire ask for an accommodation for a disability during orientation?
- Should a pregnant employee be allowed to sit on a stool instead of standing?
Learn how to respond to these scenarios and more. Participants will learn to confidently engage in the interactive process, determine undue hardship, as well as recognize and prevent retaliation.
$300.00 per person Thursday, July 17, 2025 9:00am – 12:10pm Pacific | 12:00pm – 3:10pm Eastern
- The U.S. EEOC is recognized by SHRM to offer Professional Development Credits (PDCs) for SHRM-CP® or SHRM-SCP®. This activity has been approved for 3 hours credit.
- This program has been pre-approved for 3 hours of HR (General) credit toward aPHR®, aPHRi™, PHR®, PHRca®, SPHR®, GPHR®, PHRi™ and SPHRi™ recertification through HR Certification Institute® (HRCI®).
- This course meets 3 Hours of the yearly 8-hour refresher training requirements for federal agency Investigator OR Counselor training.
- This course has been submitted for continuing legal education credit for the states of California and Nevada.
Relevant to a national audience, especially frontline supervisors and those responsible for managing and training them: employers, HR professionals, EEO specialists, management.
For questions concerning this training, please contact Linda Li at linda.li@eeoc.gov
|