EEOC SUES STAFFING COMPANY FOR NATIONAL ORIGIN DISCRIMINATION

Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.

eeoc banner

St. Louis District Office

St. Louis District Office                    CONTACT: Andrea G. Baran, Regional Attorney
Robert A. Young Building                (314) 406-2810 * andrea.baran@eeoc.gov
1222 Spruce Street, Room 8.100
St. Louis, Missouri 63103                CONTACT: Patrick Holman, Senior Trial Attorney
314-798-1960                                  (405) 666-0374 * patrick.holman@eeoc.gov
TTY: 800-669-6820
                                                        CONTACT: Lauren W. Johnston, Senior Trial Attorney
                                                        (405) 666-0379 * lauren.johnston@eeoc.gov

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 17, 2022

                                      EEOC SUES STAFFING COMPANY FOR
                                        NATIONAL ORIGIN DISCRIMINATION
     ResourceMFG Rejected Naturalized Citizen Because She Was Born in Germany,
                                                     Federal Agency Charges

          ST. LOUIS – ResourceMFG, a national manufacturing specialty staffing company, violated federal law when it failed to refer an Oklahoma job applicant for employment because she was not born in the United States, the U.S. Equal Employment Oppor­tunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a recently filed lawsuit.

          According to the EEOC’s suit, Anke Hicks, a German-born naturalized U.S. citizen, interviewed with a ResourceMFG recruiter in February 2020 and was offered a position at XPO Logistics, a federal government contractor, that required U.S. citizenship. ResourceMFG told Hicks that in order to complete the hiring process, she was required to present a United States birth certificate. Hicks explained that she did not have a U.S. birth certificate, but she could provide documents proving her U.S. citizenship. ResourceMFG terminated the onboarding process and told Hicks she could not be hired because she was not born in the United States, the EEOC said.

          National origin discrimination – which occurs when an employer treats applicants or employees unfavorably because they are from a particular country or part of the world, or because of their ethnicity or accent – violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The EEOC filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Employbridge of Dallas, Inc. d/b/a ResourceMFG, Civil Action No. CIV-22-499-C) after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement via its conciliation pro­cess. The EEOC seeks back pay, compensatory, and punitive damages for Hicks, as well as injunctive relief to prevent future discrimina­tion.

          “Citizenship requirements are permitted only where required by law, regulation, or government contract,” said Andrea G. Baran, regional attorney for the EEOC’s St. Louis District office. “But staffing companies providing workers to government contractors cannot add additional requirements, such as U.S. birth, to their selection process.”

          David Davis, acting director of the EEOC’s St. Louis District office, added, “As a nation of immigrants, we embrace those who choose to go through the strenuous process to become U.S. citizens. Title VII prohibits discrimination against those individuals because they were born elsewhere.”

          For more information on national origin discrimination, please visit https://www.eeoc.gov/national-origin-discrimination.

          The EEOC’s St. Louis District office oversees Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma and a portion of southern Illinois.

           The EEOC advances opportunity in the workplace by enforcing federal laws prohibiting employ­ment discrimination. More information is available at www.eeoc.gov.  Stay connected with the latest EEOC news by subscribing to our email updates.


                                                                        # # #