We understand that many residents are worried about ULEZ being introduced and fully understand these worries, especially at the time of a cost of living crisis which is affecting so many people.
As a Cabinet, we have debated this issue at great length as far back as last summer when we submitted our comments as part of the public consultation on the Mayor of London’s proposal to expand ULEZ to all outer London boroughs including Havering. Our response can be viewed online.
At all times, we have tried to look at the issue objectively. Although air quality is generally good in Havering, we understand that air quality can still be improved and public health will benefit from this. We will certainly be reviewing our own Air Quality Action Plan that was agreed a few years ago, as well doing all that we can to improve air quality around Launders Lane, Rainham, as well as some of the other small number of hotspots around the borough such as Transport for London maintained Gallows Corner, around Romford bus garage and the area that borders the M25.
However, especially given the outcome of the public consultation, we were still disappointed with the Mayor’s decision to sign the legal order to go ahead with his plans and our response to this can be seen on our website.
If the Mayor of London is determined to press ahead with his plans, we feel its introduction should at the very least be delayed to 2026 to allow residents time to make appropriate adjustment, particularly during this period of high inflation which is also impacting the second hand car market. The Mayor of London needs to pause his plans, in order to consider some of the unintended consequences of his proposal that I have mentioned below, speak to all outer London Borough Councils, as well as those that border London. The Mayor needs to consider an enhanced scrappage scheme to ensure that no resident is left worse off by having to change their car, including those who use their car for business purposes.
We are aware under Section 295 GLA Act 1999, the Mayor has powers to introduce and operate a “charging scheme in respect of the keeping or use of motor vehicles on roads in its area”. Even without what is known as a Section 8 Agreement being signed by Councils (and we haven’t) the permission to install the infrastructure is still available to the Mayor. The Act also overrides any issues around planning consent required in relation to the cameras and signage. However, we understand that the Government are considering using their veto under the Act as the proposal may be inconsistent with national transport policy.
|