Read feedback to our call for input on Big Tech in financial services
Feedback to our call for input identified no immediate harm from data asymmetry between Big Tech firms and financial services. But there is still a risk that a lack of data sharing could limit future competition and delay innovation.
We now plan to work with Big Tech to examine how their data could be most helpful for financial firms and consumers, and to ensure competition evolves effectively.
Travel insurance signposting rules for consumers with medical conditions
We published our post implementation review of travel insurance signposting rules for consumers with medical conditions on 11 April. This review is relevant to firms that manufacture and/or offer retail travel insurance and includes action points for firms to consider. Firms need to ensure they signpost appropriately to our directories as required and ensure customers are getting fair value from their travel insurance products.
Overall, we consider that our signposting intervention (PS20/3) has had a positive impact on the market.
We expect to consult later this year on updating the £100 medical condition premium trigger point for signposting.
Changes to CCR002 and CCR007 consumer credit help pages
Following our November fee consultation paper, we have changed (Handbook Notice) how consumer credit firms calculate their proxy measure of annual income. These changes could affect how we calculate your annual fees.
To know what action you should take, if you use the proxy measure of annual income to respond to Question 6 of the CCR007 please review the CCR007 help page. If you use the proxy measure of annual income to respond to Question 12 of the CCR002 please review the CCR002 help page.
New SUP15 webform
Principle 11 requires a firm to deal with its regulators in an open and cooperative way and to disclose to us anything relating to the firm of which we would reasonably expect notice.
To improve the efficiency of this process, we have created a new webform for Sup 15 notification submission. This asks for more details of the issue before firms upload their submission. This will allow us to identify high-risk concerns which we may need to escalate promptly.
The webform has now been released. Firms should use it when submitting a Sup 15 notification.
Digital Securities Sandbox
We are consulting with the Bank of England on the UK’s first Digital Securities Sandbox (DSS). The new DSS reshapes how we regulate by allowing firms to test regulatory changes using real world situations before these changes are made permanent.
The DSS will support the adoption of innovative technology like Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) in the trading and settlement of securities such as shares and bonds.
We hope this will be a more effective, collaborative and quicker way of delivering regulatory change. Have your say by 29 May 2024.
Fees and levies: rates proposals 2024/25
We are consulting on rules that enable us to raise regulatory fees and levies in 2024/25 to fund the FCA and Financial Ombudsman Service, as well as rules that enable us to collect certain levies on behalf of government departments.
So that firms can assess the impact of our proposals, we provide an online fees calculator which will enable you to estimate your fees for 2024/25.
Please consider our proposals and send us your comments by 14 May 2024.
Strengthening protections for borrowers in financial difficulty
We have confirmed stronger protections for borrowers in financial difficulty. We incorporated aspects of the temporary Covid tailored support guidance (TSG) for credit, overdrafts and mortgages into the Handbook. We also updated our mortgage guidance for firms.
The new rules come into force on 4 November 2024.
Proposals for the design of the future entity for UK open banking
The Joint Regulatory Oversight Committee (JROC) has published proposals for the Future Entity. This follows consultation with industry through the Future Entity Working Group, which presented its findings to JROC in November 2023.
The document invites firms to comment on a targeted set of questions on the open banking Future Entity’s recommended structure, governance, and new funding model, both in the interim and long-term.
Stakeholders are invited to feed back by 20 May 2024.
Introducing additional payment optionality for investment research services
We are proposing a new way of paying for investment research.
The proposals would give asset managers greater freedom in how they pay for research, supporting their investment decisions. This greater choice should suit firms of varying business models and sizes, helping to promote competition.
It will allow the ‘bundling’ of payments for third-party research and trade execution, and would exist alongside those already available, such as payment from an asset manager's own resources or from a dedicated account.
Please send comments on the proposals to us by 5 June 2024.
FCA sets out findings against Link Fund Solutions
This month we published our findings against Link Fund Solutions. This sets out that it failed to act with due skill, care and diligence in its management of the Woodford Equity Income Fund (WEIF). We found that between 31 July 2018 and the fund's suspension on 3 June 2019, LFS failed to manage the liquidity of the fund and to properly oversee Woodford Investment Management (WIM). We also published a statement about warning notices issued to Neil Woodford and WIM proposing to take action against them for their conduct in the management of the WEIF.
Credit Reporting Governance Body report
The Interim Working Group (IWG) set up to produce recommendations to the FCA on a new Credit Reporting Governance Body has published its first report.
The IWG is developing the new governance arrangements in the credit information market.
Read our good practice for principal firms with credit broking permissions
We’ve published good practice and areas for improvements for principal firms with credit broking permissions.
The publication is part of our ongoing proactive work to improve principals' oversight of appointed representatives (ARs) and raise standards across financial services. It provides insights on principal firms’:
- due diligence when appointing ARs
- ongoing monitoring of ARs
Firms should consider our findings and address any gaps.
Financial crime guide update
We are consulting on proposed changes to the Financial Crime Guide (FCG).
The proposals focus on areas where there have been recent developments, such as sanctions, proliferation financing, transaction monitoring and cryptoassets.
The Guide helps firms assess the adequacy of their financial crime systems and controls and remedy deficiencies. It doesn’t contain rules and imposes no new requirements. It provides guidance which we expect firms to have read and considered, to ensure effective financial crime systems and controls are in place.
Have your say on the proposals by 27 June 2024.
Update to our business interruption insurance webpages
The business interruption insurance Covid-19 calculator is no longer operative as the reporting function used publicly available third-party data that has now been decommissioned.
We remind insurers of their obligation to treat customers fairly and provide reasonable guidance to policyholders throughout the claims journey. When insurers are assessing claims that require evidence of a case of Covid-19 occurring in the relevant policy area they should ensure that they consider all available data or information. This includes publicly available data or the firm’s own internal data.
Policyholders can continue to seek to evidence their claims using any relevant data or information available to them. This may include using public data that remains available, for example, data referred to in our former Finalised Guidance published in March 2021.
Consumer Duty information request on consumer support
We will be undertaking a two-stage multi-firm review of how firms are supporting their consumers. In the first stage, in summer 2024 we will contact around 400 firms across different sectors to get insight into the levels of support provided.
In the second stage, in autumn 2024, we will request more detailed information from a smaller sample of firms on their consumer support offer. The aim of this work is to identify and share good practices and challenge firms who offer poor levels of support to customers, including those with characteristics of vulnerability.
We will share our findings of the review in early 2025.
InvestSmart
On Monday 15 April, we launched the latest phase of the InvestSmart campaign, which aims to help consumers make better-informed investment decisions that suit their financial circumstances and attitude to risk.
Advertising activity is live across several channels including, paid social, online video and out-of-home advertising, including train and Tube placements.
Advisory committee on secondary markets
On 22 April, we published our call for expressions of interest for market participants to join our advisory committee on secondary markets.
The Committee was set up in 2022 and we are now renewing the membership in line with our terms of reference. The purpose of the Committee is to support our work in wholesale secondary markets. The Committee is chaired by us and is composed of senior individuals who are experts in how secondary markets function.
Market participants who are interested in joining should see our published call for interest for further information.
Applications close on 13 May 2024.
British Steel Pension Scheme (BSPS) decision letter
Many British Steel Pension Scheme (BSPS) members suffered financial loss after being advised to transfer out of the scheme. We've been investigating a number of complaints on this, and our evidence suggests 46% of all transfers were unsuitable.
We have now published our main decision letter. In this we explain in detail how we carefully considered the concerns complainants raised and the actions we took. We concluded that, while there have been lessons for us to learn, for example, in strengthening links with partners such as the Pensions Regulator, we took appropriate regulatory action based on the information available at the time. We have, therefore, not upheld the complaints.
Back to the top
|