In Harper Lee’s novel, To Kill a Mocking Bird, a
rabid dog growls his way onto the street where Atticus Finch and his family live.
The entire neighborhood is watching, waiting and afraid to act. They see the
threat, yet because of their own weakness in the face of danger, they are
unwilling to respond. Most of the townsfolk in the fictional town of Maycomb,
Alabama, simply bolt their doors and wait for someone else to do the dirty
work. Atticus, was the one man who was willing to exercise his own courage and prudence
by stepping up and shooting the dog.
In the story, Lee uses the rapid dog as a symbol for a
“madness” that must be slain. What is the madness? – unconscionable community
consensus.
In the novel, community consensus had rallied against
Atticus because he was a lawyer, willing to defend a man that the town believed
was guilty. Public consensus said, “Tom Robinson was guilty,” simply because he
was a black man. In this way, the book, shows us that overwhelming consensus
means nothing if it is based on unfounded bias and prejudice.
This same type of dangerous consensus is what litters the
field of discussion for most environmental fads. The tragedy happening in our
public forests today follows this same vein. These vast resources are
burning-up as we watch. The paradox of forest management is that forests are
healthier when well-rounded policies regarding harvest, thinning, and
re-planting are used. Unfortunately, the current one-size-fits-all policy implies
that humans should remove themselves from the forest because Mother Nature
knows best.
The Wilderness initiatives that we see destroying our
forests were created with good intentions and sound principles. At
the time, environmental ecology was not well understood, and most regulatory
attempts were aimed at egregious mistakes. However, in an attempt to understand
how the world works and how humanity fits in, a faulty assumption arose – “man is
the problem.” This mindset implies that man’s technological achievements are
unwelcome. This is why motorized vehicles are not allowed in Wilderness Areas
and why there is a concerted effort to remove the four dams along the Klamath
River.
David Attenborough reinforced this faulty worldview with
his claim that humans are, “a
plague on the Earth.” His faulty model dovetails with
Richard Dawkins evolutionary maxim that suggests the purpose of life is only reproduction.
In humans, this means our “selfish
genes” are bound to mindless reproductive tendencies bursting forth
like maggots on roadside carrion.
However, a more appropriate stewardship model would
recognize that humans are the only free, moral agents on the planet. This means
only people can use insight, judgement, wisdom and discernment to engineer a
better world for ourselves, our posterity, animals and environment. In a word,
people care.
People also have the technical expertise to control their
environment by creating, converting and utilizing the planet’s natural
resources for energy, cell phones, and tomatoes. Quite frankly, neither the
Ocelot, Octopus, or Opossum give a rip about the plight of the Blue Whale or
Bandicoot.
Environmentalism has generated a robust record of direct
observations about the circumstances in our natural world. However, the
physical data collection efforts don’t lead to, or create policy direction,
guidelines or programs. Those are set by non-scientific and politically
motivated actors seeking to maximize their own power.
The modern environmental movement has mainly been
effective by using small, politically correct groups to commandeer the
political power stored within the walls of the over-burdening regulatory state.
When tax-payer funded bureaucracies are used to force compliance with the
latest fad then protected markets are created and regulated, with profits for
the chosen few. Their Malthusian
reasoning was simple and straight-forward; controls were needed because too
many people are consuming too many resources
Legislators assumed that a one-size fits all, top-down
policy would be the best solution, but these regulatory efforts are typically
mired in unintended consequences and bureaucratic failure. Single-focus
strategies are problematic because they force large swaths of the landscape to
fall under one set of rules. Yet, all landscapes are not the same.
Additionally, the rules, regulations and regimentation force millions of people
to behave like herded animals. This, in turn, strains both the market and the
environment.
Economist Barry
Brownstein notes, “Politicians
who trust their seat-of-the-pants good intentions inevitably become authoritarians.
They are relying on the limits of their error-prone minds and not on proven
principles that promote human flourishing.”
Every summer it is easy to see how many trees are being
saved through the misguided policy effort of curtailing forest production – just look
outside. You can see the saved trees going up in smoke. Surrendering our forest
policy to Nature’s whims creates dangerous conditions where homes, forests,
watersheds and resources are squandered.
Additionally, the unhealthy air quality conditions impact
millions of people and entirely negates the possibility for greenhouse gas absorption.
The landscape will need at least another 30-40 years to develop the same
capacity for greenhouse gas absorption as exists today.
Today’s wildfires are the most relevant contributor to fine
particulate pollution (PM2.5.) Since the mid-1980s, the total US area burned by
wildfires has been increasing, with fires in the Northwest United States
accounting for 50–60 percent of that increase, according to a recent report.
In essence, the environmental policies that were designed in
an effort to protect forests are actually responsible for destroying them.
As part of the Oregon Legislature’s Fire Caucus, I will
continue to work towards correcting our stewardship model for proper forest
management on our public lands.
Remember, if we don’t stand for
rural Oregon values and common-sense no one will.
Dennis Linthicum Oregon State Senate 28
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1728 Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-305, Salem, Oregon 97301 Email: sen.DennisLinthicum@oregonlegislature.gov Website: http://www.oregonlegislature.gov/linthicum
|