Oklahoma begins task of compliance with
NCLB after loss of flexibility waiver
OKLAHOMA CITY (Aug. 28, 2014) – In
the wake of the U.S. Department of Education (USDE) decision not to extend
Oklahoma’s No Child Left Behind (NCLB) waiver, state Superintendent of Public
Instruction Janet Barresi today directed state education officials to
immediately begin the task of compliance with NCLB, which is part of the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
“This
decision by the federal government is disappointing and frustrating. Oklahoma
has made significant strides forward in strengthening our schools, progress
that has largely been possible because of the flexibility of the waiver,”
Barresi said. “The State Department of Education worked hard making Oklahoma’s
case to USDE. The state’s congressional delegation provided staunch support for
the waiver extension, as did many others.
“Unfortunately,
the USDE decided otherwise. The loss of the waiver will be a significant
challenge for our districts and schools, as well as for this state agency. But
Oklahomans are resilient and resolute, and our education community will do what
needs to be done to meet the requirements of NCLB.”
On
Aug. 28, USDE notified the Oklahoma State Department of Education (OSDE) that Oklahoma
is losing the NCLB Flexibility Waiver that gives the state and districts relief
on 13 federal regulations.
Although
USDE directed Oklahoma to comply with the bulk of NCLB as soon as possible,
federal officials stipulated that a key component of that law won’t have to be
implemented until the 2015-2016 school year. USDE said Oklahoma will have one year
to comply with a requirement that 20 percent of Title I funds be set aside for
supplemental educational services (SES) and transportation for school choice.
That
additional time will be helpful to districts, said Kerri White, OSDE assistant
superintendent for teacher and leader effectiveness.
“In
this era of teacher shortages and minimal per-pupil funding, the additional
year to prepare for a set-aside for SES and choice-related transportation will
likely spare districts from laying off additional teachers and support staff,”
White said. “Students will have direct access to services and supports they
need to improve their reading and math skills this year, while administrators
plan for these additional funding restrictions and federal requirements to go
into place next year.
In
the meantime, OSDE will be required to monitor district compliance with all
other regulations that have been waived for the last two school years,
including limiting how districts can spend many of their federal dollars.
No
Child Left Behind regulations also limit which schools may apply for certain
grants, what annual targets must be set for improvement in each school, and
even which schools are eligible for Title I funds. Most notably, NCLB
regulations will require some schools to replace staff, change curriculum or
possibly shut down.
The OSDE first applied for the flexibility waiver in November 2011, with the
waiver eventually granted the following February.
But
the signing into law of House Bill 3399 earlier this year placed Oklahoma’s
waiver in danger.
The USDE
requires all states applying for waivers to use standards that are considered
college- and career-ready. HB 3399 required Oklahoma’s K-12 schools to return
to using Priority Academic Student Skills (PASS) standards in English Language
Arts (ELA) and math for two years, during which time new academic standards would
be crafted by Oklahomans.
Immediately
following the passage of HB 3399, Supt. Barresi asked the Oklahoma State
Regents for Higher Education to review PASS standards in ELA and math for
alignment with college- and career-ready guidelines. Higher education officials
were unable to complete that task before the Aug. 12 deadline to submit the waiver’s
extension request.
As a
result, Oklahoma submitted its application without an assessment of PASS by
higher education. USDE had indicated an assessment by higher education
officials would be essential in determining the adequacy of PASS.
Now
that the application has been rejected, Oklahoma schools will now fall back
under the mandates of NCLB.
“Because the State Department of Education
has oversight authority for a number of issues relating to federal education
funds such as Title I, it will be critical that SDE personnel provide immense
district technical assistance training on the rudiments of ESEA’s No Child Left
Behind Act,” said Ramona Coats, SDE assistant state superintendent of
federal programs.
“Districts will need a clear understanding of both
fiscal and programmatic requirements regarding maintaining the integrity of
both the program and the funds under ESEA. Some district superintendents
are new to their positions this year and may have never served under ESEA compliance
requirements. This will be a steep learning curve for some. For others, refresher
trainings will be necessary.”
Upward of
90 percent of Oklahoma schools are expected to be affected to some degree by
the loss of the waiver. Under NCLB, schools must meet 100-percent proficiency
on a number of benchmarks to avoid being designated as a school in need of
improvement. The number of failing schools in need of improvement could now
swell from its current 490 to more than 1,600, according to NCLB definitions of
failing.
“The loss
of the waiver became all but inevitable with the passage of HB 3399. That became
more of a certainty when higher education did not evaluate PASS to be college-
and career-ready and the State Board of Education delayed starting the process
toward new standards. The federal regulations being imposed on Oklahoma are
counterproductive and overly rigid, but the time for hand-wringing is over,”
said Barresi.
“Oklahoma
must craft and implement outstanding academic standards for ELA and math that
are college- and career-ready. To simply take PASS standards and attempt to
improve them and call them college- and career-ready may satisfy the federal
government to allow flexibility in spending, but it relegates our children to
the same sad culture and set of expectations that existed when I entered
office.”
###
|