PWDU - FSP Update - April 2018

MDH logo

Partnership and Workforce Development - Food Safety Partnership Update

View this as a webpage

April 2018

FSP Meeting Recap

Packaged Food Labeling in Retail Food Establishments in Minnesota

Approximately 120 attendees learned about Food Labeling for Retail Food Establishments at our March 14 Food Safety Partnership of Minnesota video-conference meeting. Thanks to all participants. Our presenters represented varied sectors of the retail food community in Minnesota, and shared practical tips and resources drawn from their experience with and understanding of packaged food labeling.

Carrie Rigdon (MDA) highlighted Minnesota’s Cottage Food Law.

Josh Rounds and Sean Buuck (MDH-IDEPC) provided an update on foodborne disease outbreaks associated with labeling.

  • Four Salmonella outbreaks associated with raw chicken products from 1998 to 2006 led to changes in cooking instructions and how the products were described on labels. And in 2005, another Salmonella outbreak investigation found flour in cake batter ice cream to be the likely culprit.
  • Based on three outbreaks between 2009 and 2016, flour appears to be an emerging vehicle for shiga toxin-producing E. coli. Some companies have made voluntary changes to labels.
  • An outbreak of Salmonella linked to raw pet food led to removal of the words “human grade” from product information.

Holly Blais (MDA) identified and explained the required elements of a retail packaged food label.

  • Identity (name of food)
  • Net quantity of contents
  • Ingredients (including major food allergens)
  • Business name and address
  • Nutrition facts

PWDU’s Jim Topie presented several different retail scenarios, and walked us through how to determine if a label is required. Jim identified two key questions to ask:

  1. Is this food product packaged?
  2. Is this food product presented for self-service?

Kathy Brandt (U of M Extension) brought the discussion back to public health risks of food allergen labeling and mislabeling. Kathy shared both stories and statistics related to food allergens, helping us better understand the personal, economic and public health impact of food allergies.

U of M Extension offers an online Food allergen training for food service employees.

Jim Bressi (Kwik Trip) rounded out the session by bringing the industry perspective into focus for us. In his role as director of food research and product development for Kwik Trip, Jim oversees brand development, trademarks, concept graphic design, packaging choice and look, nutrition and labeling. Key elements of their 67-step label development process are:

  • Determining new (or modified) product.
  • Creating a “recipe card” with details of materials, assembly order, net weight, pack size, item code, UPC code and pricing.
  • Creating a label, including identifying and applying details, formatting, internal and regulatory review, printing and proofing.

When labels are received at the production plant, employees use a transparency to help ensure label accuracy. If deviations from the transparency are identified, the labels are rejected. Only after verification are labels placed into service.

Additional resources

FARE – Food for Thought Video Series

MN teen dies after peanut allergy reaction

Food Allergens: Best Practices for Assessing, Managing and Communicating the Risks


Bug of the Quarter

Food Safety Partnership of Minnesota

Mystery Outbreak! Part 2

If you read Part 1 of this Mystery Outbreak, and have been sitting on pins and needles, wait no more! Here is the thrilling conclusion to the 2017 Salmonella Heidelberg outbreak associated with a fast food chain in Anytown, Minnesota.

Additional cases

In early November, additional cases of illness were reported. Three cases reported eating at the North location, and one case at the South location, all in the first week of October. EH staff called the store owners to inform them that now both North and South store locations were implicated in the outbreak.

Interventions

On November 1, MDH sanitarians visited the South location to interview all employees. Both North and South stores were required to clean and sanitize, and the North store continued screening employees for illness.

Managers reported that the two stores typically do not share employees, however one employee who was identified as an asymptomatic carrier had moved from the North store to the South store.

More additional cases

On November 22, a local hospital reported that a restaurant employee was hospitalized and tested positive for Salmonella. One week later, the same hospital identified another case of Salmonella. When interviewed by MDH, the case reported that he and multiple ill family members had eaten at the South store in late November.

Final interventions

On November 30, with these new cases identified, the restaurant owner decided to voluntarily close both North and South locations at the request of MDH.

While closed, the stores brought in an outside company to clean and sanitize all surfaces. All employees were excluded from work until they submitted two negative stool samples. The North store was required to install an additional handwashing sink, employee training on handwashing was conducted, and all food was discarded.

Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) was contacted to perform food product testing and to collect product samples from the North store. They collected four samples of ground beef patties and 30 environmental swab samples. All samples were negative for Salmonella.

The restaurant ownership also hired an independent company to collect environmental samples, all of which were negative for Salmonella.

The North store reopened on December 11, and the South store reopened on December 14 after all completing all required interventions.

Summary

In total, eight employees tested positive for the outbreak strain of Salmonella Heidelberg. Three were asymptomatic. The earliest positive stool samples were collected from September 24 through December 12.

Forty-seven cases were identified; nine were hospitalized; and illness onset dates ranged from August 12 to December 8.

Restaurant records indicate that approximately two-thirds of meals served daily include a beef patty. In comparison, all cases who could recall the foods they had eaten reported eating food with a beef patty (n=12). Statistical analysis showed a significant association between illness and beef patties as well as condiments only served on burger patties.

Conclusion

Multiple Salmonella-positive food employees, and possible opportunities for both cross-contamination by food employees facilitated by improper handwashing and glove use, were identified. It is plausible that Salmonella was introduced to the facility in a food product or food employee, and then disseminated through infected food employees and cross-contamination.


Training Opportunities

Fun On The Farm: Agritourism Workshop

  • Wednesday, April 4, 2018, 5:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.
  • St. Cloud Regional Extension Office, 3601 18th Street South, Suite 113

 

  • Wednesday, April 18, 2018, 5:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.
  • Carver County Extension Office, 11360 Hwy 212 West, Cologne

 

Minnesota Environmental Health Association (MEHA) Spring Education Conference

FDA Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program Standards Self-Assessment and Verification Audit Workshop

  • Tuesday – Thursday, May 22 – 24, 2018
  • Freeman Building, OLF-B144/145
  • Email Cassie Mueller for more information

Food Safety Partnership video-conference: Minnesota Food Code

  • Wednesday, September 19, 2018, 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon
  • Freeman Building, OLF-B107, video-conference sites statewide and livestream
  • Registration details and CEUs pending