DFL Anti-law Enforcement Public Safety Bill
This week House Democrats unveiled their Public Safety Omnibus bill, which includes numerous anti-law enforcement policies, as well as provisions to reduce sentences for criminals and hide even violent offenses from the public record.
Minnesota Democrats are pushing an anti-law enforcement agenda while reducing consequences for criminals. It's madness. Democrats are pushing policies with bipartisan opposition because of the anti-law enforcement views on the far left of the Democrat caucus.
There are good provisions in the bill that could have strong bipartisan support, including important reforms to Minnesota's Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) laws and grants to combat sex trafficking, but the same radical partisan agenda that derailed the SAFE Account earlier this session makes it impossible to support.
Minnesota's top law enforcement organizations — the Minnesota Police and Peace Officers Association (MPPOA), the Minnesota Chiefs Association, and the Minnesota Sheriff's Association — sent letters this week in opposition to the Public Safety Omnibus, highlighting several concerns, including unfunded mandates on local law enforcement agencies, automatic expungement of numerous violent crimes, and granting activist civilian organizations policy and discipline power over local agencies.
The law enforcement groups also noted their disappointment that the bill did not include funding for the proposed SAFE Account, as well as the Arik Matson bill that strengthens penalties for deadly force assault of police officers and other criminal justice officials. The Officer Matson bill (SF82) has bipartisan co-authors in the Senate and passed the Senate Judiciary Committee without opposition on a voice vote earlier this year.
You can find a copy of MPPOA's letter here, and a copy of the letter from the Minnesota Police and Sheriffs here.
|