Restrictions on Wedding Venues
Currently, indoor wedding venues are limited to 10 people or 2 households if food is served, while restaurants and bars can operate at up to 50 percent capacity, and indoor events and entertainment are open at 25% capacity up to 150 attendees.
Restricting wedding venues to 10 or 15 people while allowing restaurants and other businesses to be open at a much higher capacity is a double standard clearly not based in science.
Last week, House Republicans attempted to end the severe and nonsensical restrictions on wedding venues. It is time to trust Minnesota wedding venues to safely operate so the many industries that rely on them can have some certainty.
Unfortunately, Democrats voted down the amendment using a procedural motion.
SAFE Account Proposal
This week the Public Safety and Criminal Justice Reform Finance and Policy Committee, heard a bill to create a fund called the State Aid for Emergencies (SAFE) Account. Part of this is being done in anticipation of possible unrest during the upcoming Chauvin trial in Minneapolis. As a strong supporter of law enforcement, want to make sure law enforcement agencies have the resources they need to respond to emergencies and potential riots.
Unfortunately, this bill does not address the problem. A coalition of law enforcement associations wrote to the committee:
"Our members remain concerned, however, that no matter what legislation is passed, the response for mutual aid will not be as robust as the public may expect. Our members’ concern is due to the continued demonization of law enforcement officers by certain public officials at various levels of government."
The Minneapolis Police Department remains down 200 officers from the level they were in 2019 following attempts by the City Council to defund the police.
I also have concerns about the proposed language, including the fact that it gives unilateral authority over the account to the Department of Public Safety (DPS) Commissioner to decide how reimbursements are given, and a vast expansion of which costs are eligible for reimbursement.
I am sure we will see this bill come up again, and when we do I intend to push for changes to put it in a form that would address the entire problem.
|