September 2016

Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page.

Minnesota Statewide Initiative to Reduce Recidivism

Fourth Edition

September 2016

Changing Minds to Change Lives

By Kelley Heifort, MN DOC Community Reentry Director

One of the first steps in using “what works” is to use a valid risk and needs assessment to gauge an individual’s likelihood of re-offense and to find out what areas in their lives bring them the highest risk. In Minnesota, we’ve been particularly good at conducting these type of assessments for more than a decade. We often fall short, however, in our ability to intently work with and prioritize men and women for interventions that are targeted to change those high risk areas identified in assessments. Minnesota is very fortunate to have a broad variety of community service providers and programs to meet many needs of releasing people ranging from employment and education services, to mental and chemical health providers, and more. MNSIRR is working to keenly incorporate these services into pre and post release case planning for those at highest risk to re-offend. 

One of the more challenging risk areas for people who end up in prison is their elevated criminogenic needs around Antisocial Values, Beliefs and Personality Traits (outlined below from our partners at Prison Fellowship, an excerpt from “The Risk of Returning to Prison: What Should We Really Focus On?”, written by Becky Beane.) By adding specific approaches to our services and daily interventions with incarcerated or released men and women, we can help to change their distorted thinking and behaviors.  

  • Antisocial Values and Beliefs - Offenders generally exhibit certain thinking errors that affect how they interpret and process information. These errors include a sense of entitlement, self-justification, blaming others, unrealistic perceptions of reality, and taking on a “victim stance” (for example, “the system is out to get me”). They often misinterpret benign behaviors or harmless remarks as threats (“he disrespected me”). They confuse wants with needs.
  • Antisocial Peers - Associating primarily with friends involved in criminal behavior puts one at high risk of sharing in that behavior. Over time, the offender loses contact with “pro-social” people, and then has no social support network to help reinforce appropriate behaviors. In fact, research indicates that a person’s companions may actually be the greatest predictor of criminal behavior. However, offenders often deny the influence of others on their lives, as that would threaten their sense of autonomy. They fancy themselves as leaders, not followers.
  • Personality Traits - Some offenders have what could be legitimately diagnosed as an antisocial personality disorder, characterized by a “pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others.” They are habitually deceitful, irresponsible, aggressive and violent, impulsive; they fail to conform to social norms and laws, show reckless disregard for others’ safety, and experience little or no remorse for their mistreatment of others. Any of these traits can steer a person toward criminal conduct.

 There are some programs, such as Thinking for a Change, which address these areas. Additionally, social service and correctional professionals can add these same lessons to everyday conversations with that same aim in mind. If we change the minds and thinking of the people with whom we work, we will show them alternative ways to problem-solve, interact with others and positively change their lives. This month’s news outlines how MNSIRR is attempting to bring new tools and interventions to professionals to help “change minds to change lives.”