|
Choose IPM!
January 15, 2024
|
|
Integrated pest management, or IPM, is a safer more, sustainable pest management strategy. IPM focuses on a variety of pest prevention and non-toxic or least-toxic pest management techniques to effectively solve pest problems. IPM strategies use pesticides only as a last resort. By using safer, more sustainable integrated pest management practices, it’s possible to manage pests while protecting staff, children, and the environment effectively and sustainably. Check out the resources below to Choose IPM at schools.
|
|
Integrated Pest Management at Schools
This infographic will show you how to spot conducive conditions for pests around your school and what to do to eliminate them.
|
Classroom Pest Prevention Tips
This infographic focuses on tips to help prevent pests from accessing indoor areas. |
|
|
Integrated Pest Management Video Series
Learn more about how to manage common pests using integrated pest management techniques by watching this video series. |
|
|
|
|
Questions? Contact Us:
Please contact the Department of Pesticide Regulation’s School IPM program by emailing school-ipm@cdpr.ca.gov. For additional information about the Integrated Pest Management Branch please visit DPR’s website.
|
|
Who We Are
The California Department of Pesticide Regulation protects human health and the environment by fostering safer and sustainable pest management practices and operating a robust regulatory system to monitor and manage the sale and use of pesticides across the state. DPR’s work includes registering all pesticides sold or used in California, conducting scientific evaluation of pesticides to assess and mitigate potential harm to human health or the environment, investing in innovative research to encourage the development and adoption of integrated pest management tools and practices, monitoring for pesticides in the air and water, conducting outreach to ensure pesticide workers, farmworkers and local communities have access to safety information, and enforcing pesticide regulations in coordination with 55 County Agricultural Commissioners and their 400 field inspectors.
|
|
|
|