 Before we get into the COVID details and updates, I thought this graphic from last week’s John’s Hopkins dashboard could set the tone. It is from the middle of last week, and it reflects the impact of both the UA and ASU reopening. More below, but keep it in mind. The area surrounding campus has put us back on top of the national rankings.
 |
|
Blue Light Recognition
Each week I give credit to someone or some group who works in health care or as one of our first responders. We’ve had police, fire, hospital workers, 911 operators, COVID testing groups – this week it’s a bit more on the lighter side, but possibly a new and important step in the coronavirus pandemic.
We’re all familiar with K9 officers who work in both drug and bomb detection, as well as in actual police investigative work. Add COVID dogs to that mix.
|
Last week, The Guardian reported on COVID K9’s working in airports in Finland. Germany, France, and Australia are also studying how they can begin using dogs to detect COVID among travelers. The human in the process has a passenger dab their skin with a wipe. The wipe is placed in a beaker, which is then set alongside beakers that contain wipes with other scents. The dog then sniffs each, and if the passenger is carrying the virus, the pooch will alert to the beaker.
The Fins doing the work say it’s 100% accurate. Nothing is. But if it’s close, it could make your next trip to the airport yet more interesting than it already is, from the standpoint of all the tests and inspections we already go through before boarding a plane.
Some of you can join me in remembering when we went straight to the gate and boarded when our flight was called. And our family members were allowed to join us there until takeoff. Nobody took off their shoes, and nobody was sniffed by a COVID K9.
|
UA COVID Hot Spot
Drilling down a bit from the Arizona statistic I opened with, the UA area is demonstrably a COVID hot spot this week. That’s validated by the extensive testing the County has done, and that I’ve helped coordinate with Rescue Me Wellness over in the towers on Tyndall.
This map comes from the Pima County health folks. What you’re looking for is the test locations (red dot) surrounded by the blue circle. Those are where multiple infections have been found. You can see they’re bunched up in the Speedway Euclid area - those are the towers. But the other locations shown on the map are all on-campus dorms or Greek houses.
  Here’s the most recent UA dashboard showing the total tests/positive for the recent 10 day period:
The 7.9% positive rate does not include the off-campus private apartment testing that the County and I have done for the area bounded by 10th/Helen, 6th/Campbell. If it did, the figure would of course be higher.
And this trend graph shows how the infection has progressed since classes opened up.
Dr. Birx from D.C. visited last week and applauded the work being done on the UA campus. We’ll of course accept all the kudos Dr. Birx offers, but incorporating the private facilities paints a different picture than just on-campus testing.
And the outbreak in some of our privately run towers may be in part due to incorrect advice being given on their own websites. If you go to the CDC website you’ll find this instruction on when to wear a facial covering:
-
CDC recommends all people 2 years of age and older wear a mask in public settings and when around people who don’t live in your household, especially when other social distancing measures are difficult to maintain.
-
COVID-19 can be spread by people who do not have symptoms and do not know that they are infected. That’s why it’s important for everyone to wear masks in public settings and practice social distancing (staying at least 6 feet away from other people).
As a part of my trying to understand why we’re having such a tough time gaining compliance in some of the high rises, I took a short tour of the Core Property (Hub and oLiv) website. I found this information being handed out to their tenants/students:
Follow the CDC’s recommendations for using a facemask:
-
The CDC does not recommend that people who are well wear a facemask to protect themselves from respiratory diseases, including COVID-19.
-
Facemasks should be used by people who show symptoms of COVID-19 to help prevent the spread of the disease to others. Anyone with symptoms should seek medical care immediately.
If kids are following the advice of Core Properties, then cramming into an elevator with others who are doing the same, it’s no wonder we’re seeing the alarmingly high infection rates that exist around the UA campus. Add this to the equally irresponsible action from the management of these places in leasing up to 90% capacity.
Mask Up Campaign
With all of that COVID activity, the City continues to have a mask-up policy in place. Above I shared the CDC guidelines – and the guidelines that appear on the Hub management website. That inconsistency may be a part of the cause of our local outbreak. In Tucson, if you’re in public settings where social distancing is not possible, you are required to wear a face covering. As I showed above, even this CDC says that’s important to curb the spread of COVID.
Presidents get their moment in the sun in ways like this:
 City Council members have a more modest forum for making public statements.
 Even so, the message is important. Please mask up to help prevent the spread.
Transit Fares
With transit on my mind, here’s a quick update on transit fares. Early in the pandemic, we voted to make riding all forms of our transit system free. We were able to cover those lost revenues with Federal relief dollars. Staff advised us that those will be running out this month and recommended a discussion of resuming some level of fare. Unanimously last week we voted to keep our bus/transit system free, at least through the end of this calendar year.
My thoughts on the decision really came down to where people are right now in terms of work and their ability to pay living costs. We’ve allocated millions of dollars that are going to help pay utilities, rent, aid for small businesses and non-profits, and money for child care. We’ve placed a moratorium on shutting down people’s water if they are late in paying. Other private utilities have done the same. And even the State has agreed to a moratorium on evictions if people can’t pay their rent due to COVID-related issues. All of that speaks to people being out of work, businesses struggling and a general uncertainty in the economy. I didn’t feel now is the time to start sending the message that we’re insensitive to the needs people are experiencing.
Many of the people who rely on transit are the same ones who are applying for and receiving some of those other forms of support. Pushing the decision on resumption of some level of cost recovery back until after the holidays I believe was the right thing to do.
Halloween Activities
Last week I spoke to a few different neighborhood groups about the Pima County Health recommendations for Halloween, and specifically for trick-or-treating. In brief, the County is recommending against sending kids out to trick or treat.
Over the weekend I confirmed with some of the Pima County folks that they’d be dressing up as wet blankets this season. But wait! Hank from Catalina Vista shared some CDC information that confirms the County advice.
Going door to door in the best of times carries some inherent risk. Now, going to a stranger's door (or opening the door to strangers) and passing food between you and the group is really not being recommended as the best idea. And if a group of kids is out in the street, properly social distancing from one another, that also brings some safety concerns to mind.
The County mentioned the pumpkin carving party – in your own family unit. We at Ward 6 are taking that one step farther.
Send us a photo of your little one(s) all suited up in their Halloween costume. That includes your furry family members. My staff will pick the top 3 and we’ll have a prize for each. Two for human kids, and one for animal kids. Our in-house rule is that none of us can vote for a kid we’re related to, so there’s some level of legitimacy in this whole scheme. But email us pictures of your goblins and we’ll line them up and pick some winners. I will confess up front that it’s going to be very difficult for a cat to win over a dog.
Use your discretion on Halloween. I’d suggest taking the Pima County and CDC recommendations to heart.
Also please remember that this is the time of year we typically see coyotes and their pups out and about in our neighborhoods. I see them regularly when I’m out walking or running. They’re a part of the ecosystem.
If you leave pumpkins on your porch, you’re attracting coyotes – and javelina – as guests. State Game and Fish recommends you carry a whistle to scare them off, keep your pets on a short leash, walk in the opposite direction if you see one, and don’t leave food for them. It is a violation of State law to intentionally feed urban wildlife. And if you have Date Palm Trees in your yard, you might want to rake up the droppings. They’re tasty nuggets for the urban critters.
|
Puppy Mill Action
More on critters. Early in the year, I began working with a couple of groups who are located up in the Phoenix area on once again shining a light on retail pet stores that are sourcing their puppies from mills. For those of you who might not be familiar, a puppy mill is where breeders warehouse puppies for later resale on the retail level. The conditions in which the animals are kept are inhumane, and the females are used up and thrown out once they’ve ‘produced’ all the ‘product’ they can.
You don’t necessarily have to be a dog lover like me in order to recognize that allowing stores to rely on this sort of activity in order to buy the pups you see in the pet shop is wrong.
Enter the folks with Bailing out Benji and Animal Wellness Action. Add Tempe City Council member Lauren Kuby, and you’ve got the group of us who wanted to make another run at shutting this down.
|
|
 |
The legwork for this was done by Bailing out Benji. Over the past few years, they’ve been combing through records from known mills and identifying which retail stores they were being sent to. We know that many went to stores in Tempe, and Animal Kingdom here in Tucson.
Rewind the tape to 2015. We had adopted a Puppy Mill Ordinance that would have made it the law in Tucson for any retail store selling puppies to source them from a rescue or shelter organization. Ours was crafted based on similar laws in the Phoenix area. The owner of Animal Kingdom and Puppies ‘n’ Love in Tempe (same guy) filed suit to have the Phoenix law overturned. At the same time he worked behind the scenes at the State Legislature to craft a bill that on its face looked like it followed standards consistent with animal welfare. The bill preempted local jurisdictions from acting independently with our own standards. He got the bill adopted, dropped his suit and as a result we never finalized the enactment of our local law.
The State law sets in place some obligations on retailers to be sure they’re not sourcing from mills. Lain Kahlstrom is the Director of State Affairs at Animal Wellness Action. Her comment to the Arizona Republic was ‘our investigation uncovered irrefutable evidence these pet stores are violating Arizona’s State law. These pet store owners are fraudulently representing to customers they don’t procure dogs from puppy mills, but in fact they are getting dogs from high-volume, out-of-State breeders with direct violations of the Animal Welfare Act.’
So what happened last week? We coordinated visits to these two stores by both TPD and Tempe PD. They recovered records of where the stores were getting their dogs from. There were around 250 puppies involved with the violations. That was far more than is needed, even under the sham State law, to force the stores into adopting a humane model of sourcing; that is, to source from rescues. The records validated the illegal sourcing, but also included paperwork that on its face appeared to PD that the retailer had made an attempt to verify the mills they were buying from were on the up and up. Based on that feigned ‘good faith,’ the police at this time didn’t see a way to move the case forward.
Simply put, we know that’s a smokescreen and are continuing to review the records that were recovered by the police in order to prove it.
Each of us involved appreciates the cooperation of the respective police departments. We also know they don’t have the time or expertise to comb through the records and connect the dots that will be necessary to force a change in how these retailers are acting. That work will continue, and we’ll be back. Puppy mills need to be shut down, and retailers who sell dogs can play a role in assuring that simply by buying their pups from rescues and shelters. It’d be great if we lived in a world where humane actions prevailed over the profit motive. We don’t, so I’ll keep working with Lauren in Tempe, Bailing out Benji, and the Animal Wellness Action group until we have closed the loop and re-presented the proof to law enforcement.
Here’s my statement that appeared in the Republic last week: “When the State passed the puppy mill preemption law, it cut short efforts in Tucson, Tempe and in the Phoenix area to clamp down on the horrendous exploitation of puppies that was happening then, and continues to occur. Through this joint effort we’ve been able to demonstrate that reality to the legislators who put the profits of a few ahead of a moral obligation to address the problem. I’m hopeful that now they’ll understand the importance of removing that preemption so local jurisdictions can work to put an end to the puppy mill industry.”
There’s an election in November. Learn how candidates feel about preempting local governments from adopting puppy mill ordinances.
|
What’s Happening in Colleges and Universities Across the Country?
This map of hot spots around the Country demonstrates that the infection will spread where population density is greatest. We’ve seen that in off-campus apartment settings on a smaller, local scale since the UA reopened.
 During his weekly press briefing, UA President Robbins shared this information. It reflects the Arizona experience over the last couple of weeks that I opened with. It’s largely driven by virus infections around the UA, ASU, and NAU campuses. It’s cause for concern for people who live around the UA campus.
 The increase in COVID around the perimeter of campus is being driven by behavior. In that same briefing, Robbins shared this graph that shows campus administration is aware of large group gatherings and parties around the UA campus.
I’ll dig more deeply into the COVID data below, but first some news about what’s happening at other Universities around the Country.
I’ll share about the Pac 12 football season below. Other schools have not had smooth sailing when trying to play football this fall. The U. of Houston has had to cancel 5 games because either they or their opponent had COVID outbreaks. And last weekend Notre Dame at Wake Forest was postponed when 7 positive tests came back for Irish players. They paused football activities on the Notre Dame campus ‘until further notice.’
Axios ran a poll of college students and found that 51% of them say institutions made the wrong choice in allowing students to come back onto campus this fall. And 60% of them say they’re learning less in the online format than in-person class work. You can see the whole poll here - according to a new poll.
Those results seem to run counter to claims that campuses reopened for in-person instruction due to ‘overwhelming student demand.’ Or perhaps the students found out the virus is for real once they came back and now attitudes have changed?
And just as the Pac 12 decided to begin football, the U. of Colorado has had to shut down practices as a result of Boulder County issuing an order banning all gatherings of 18-22-year-olds. Yes, the order is that specific.
You can read the whole thing here - The order
It’s in reaction to CU students gathering inside dorms and bars around campus. Many of the students were asymptomatic, but there were 933 positive COVID cases on their campus in the past month, so they took this action. Here are the guts of what’s now in place at CU.
The Pac 12 is scheduled to restart football on November 6th. The shut down at Colorado will give their team only 4 weeks to prep for the season.
The U. Wisconsin/Madison is restarting in-person classes after their 2 week pause. They’re also asking students who have the ability to consider moving out of the dorms and to go back home. They've had over 2,700 cases of COVID among their students since the first of August.
Finally, Dr. Birx of D.C. fame visited Texas A&M last week in her cross-Country campus tour. She gave them high marks for what she called an ‘impressively low’ positivity rate. Random testing around their campus showed a 1.6% rate for the week ending September 12th. But the Houston Chronicle reported that the rate on the A&M dashboard is around 10%, which may be better described as impressively high. The Director of the Texas Children’s Hospitals Center for Vaccine Development – Peter Hotez – said “maybe she was looking at the wrong number.” Indeed.
Census 2020
The deadline for filing your census form is the end of October. For each percentage point we undercount our population, Arizona loses millions of dollars that we need in order to continue providing social services to our residents. Please, please take a moment and file your census form.
I found this graphic interesting. It shows where our population demographic is headed. In 1960 I was in the “5-9” age category. The only group with greater numbers were the “0-4.” That’s where I found my bride – a few years later, but she was a member of that group at the time. We boomers are now up in the top half of the graph, and growing. The census money will also go towards services for senior care. Yup, many of us care about filing the forms.
The Census folks worked with Damien Alameda, a buddy of mine from KOLD, on this short video. It really speaks Tucson in encouraging people to file. Even if you’ve already filed your form, take a minute and watch the video. I think you’ll enjoy it. And share it with people you know who might be on the fence over filing.
Time is running out to participate in the U.S. Census. Please make sure that you and your family are counted. Census data are used to determine funding for many programs that affect all of us ...
|
 Go to www.2020census.gov to file. It’s an investment in our local future.
Pima County and UA Area Trends
For perspective, here’s the dashboard from the UA that shows where we were the week before Labor Day.
 And here’s the data from the UA dashboard I shared above – from last weekend:
 What about wider Pima County in that same time frame? These are the numbers from the week before Labor Day weekend:
 Compared to last week. Remember, for the Pima County day-to-day change, you’re looking at the last column.
So we went in Pima County from 442 new cases the week before Labor Day to 952 last week. If you compare the before/after data from the UA, it’s pretty clear what’s causing the increase.
Pima County Health still holds the legal option for quarantining the residents of buildings that are particularly impacted. I shared the legal authority last week – here it is for you again. The ‘above measures’ it refers to is the 14 day voluntary shelter in place, and closing gyms and pools in the high rises.
Pac 12 Football and Harvard
That’s the Harvard Global Institute, not their football team. When the Pac 12 announced last week that it’s going forward with a 7 game football schedule, I was pleased to see that they’re using the Harvard health guidance standards that I’ve been sharing with you in these newsletters for the past several weeks. They’re consulting them to determine how often athletes will need to be tested.
When the Conference first announced that it was not moving ahead with competition, they based it on 3 primary concerns. One is the ability to test consistently. There’s now an agreement in place with a rapid-result antigen test firm to allow for near daily testing. Another concern was the prevalence of COVID in the Pac 12 communities. That one’s going to be a moving target. As I mentioned above, Colorado is already in shut down. And the final concern related to the possible heart impacts of COVID. To address that, the Conference is implementing cardiac monitoring protocols for all athletes who have a positive test. In addition, each school is taking part in a national COVID-19 cardiac registry that’ll allow monitoring of each athlete who shows up positive. With all of that, the first games will be played on Saturday, November 6th. There will be no fans in attendance at any of the games.
This should look familiar. It’s the Harvard Global Institute risk level chart that I’ve had in previous newsletters – in a slightly different format. The information is the same, though. This one came from the Pac 12 announcement of the standards they’re using to restart football.
 And based on which risk level a particular school falls in, this chart shows how often they’re recommending the athletes get tested with the antigen quick tests.
The Conference is recommending 1x p/week PCR tests for all athletes, in addition to the rapid antigen tests. The antigen tests are more for surveillance. The PCRs are for diagnosis. Each football team has roughly 100 players. Any way you look at it, that’s a lot of testing. Athletes who test positive on the antigen test will be isolated and given the diagnostic PCR test.
I was glad to see them using the Harvard Global standards. Last week Harvard had Pima County in the Orange risk level at 19.4 p/100,000 daily new cases, and 203 new daily cases averaging over 7 days. Here’s their map for this week.
All of those numbers went in the wrong direction this past week. The percent positive is over 8% on both the UA and State dashboards. All of that means daily athlete testing if they were to resume practice today.
The goal of course is to get the numbers down not just so the UA can play football, but for the health of the region. This link is what the Arizona Department of Health asks you to use for reporting businesses that are not abiding by the CDC/State guidelines for reopening. I mentioned previously the work TPD and UAPD are doing. But without some of your observations, they will be on a hunt and peck mission and not on the kind that removes liquor licenses and effectively shuts down bad actors.
The Red Tag unit is still operating, and now has COVID as an extra motivating tool. Report violations to RedTag@tucsonaz.gov. This alerts the City Red Tag unit to large parties.
Starting today the City is reopening the adult fitness equipment in our parks. The caution tape is coming down, and new safety signage is going up. If you see your neighbors out doing pull-ups, don’t call to report them. It’s a part of our slow reopening effort.
Central Business District
Last week the M&C voted to continue our Central Business District (CBD) and to hold off on revising the boundaries until we can engage more community outreach. A little background - a CBD is a geographically defined area within a City in which certain development incentives may be offered. The rules for the size and shape of the District are laid out in State law. The particular incentive that is tied to a CBD is a property tax abatement (Government Property Lease Excise Tax – GPLET) that’s replaced temporarily by an excise tax. That’s a crude description, but generally, if a project demonstrates through an independent 3rd party economic analysis that it will yield greater financial benefits to the community than the value of the property tax abatement, it qualifies under State law for the incentive. In the motion to approve the CBD, conditions on the GPLET were included. I was the sole no vote.
Since we voted I’ve been asked by members of the business community, and by neighborhood residents (not mutually exclusive groups, I’d add,) why I didn’t support extending the CBD and GPLET. Answering requires you to know the context in which the vote took place.
Here’s the motion that was adopted, and how the discussion went. This is from the Clerk’s records.
Council Member Fimbres: I move that the as we re-launch the process to discuss with the community to EXPAND the Central Business District and revise the GPLET policy, the community engagement process must include the following:
That the process be driven and led by Mayor and Council, with the Manager’s Office, Economic Initiatives and staff supporting the Mayor and Council through this process;
That the number of community meetings to be determined after further conversations with the Mayor and Council and,
The community engagement process to be managed and led by a facilitator that will support the Mayor and Council and staff as we move forward with GPLETs and Community Benefits Agreements.
I offered a 2nd to that motion. Then came an amendment:
Council Member Santa Cruz: I would like to include a friendly amendment that includes:
-
Analysis of community impact that includes an Equity lens to study the existing Central Business District and GPLET from 2012-2020. What were the racial and economic equity impacts of the development? Who benefitted from and/or was burdened by the development? Did rents rising displace people? If so, who? Did the development help build toward a just, equitable, and sustainable future? What are the lessons learned and recommendations for future consideration.
-
Future redistricting and GPLET conversations to also include: a Health Impact Assessment, an Equity Assessment, and incentivizing development that is specific to attainable-affordable housing, neighborhood-scale job creation including small businesses, emerging business incubators and worker-owned cooperatives.
I removed my 2nd to the motion after Fimbres accepted the amendments. Then Nikki Lee accepted the amendments and the M&C passed all of that.
We can certainly do an analysis of how development using this incentive has impacted vulnerable populations. But understand, using the GPLET has allowed many small local projects to move forward. It’s the second set of conditions that will price those small locals out of the GPLET market. That runs counter to our whole effort to promote exactly those kinds of businesses. I made that point during the M&C meeting. The reactions?
Ward 5 decried the notion that big development was benefiting from GPLETs. Here are some projects we’ve given that incentive to; Herbert Residential, Gibson Market, Brother John’s, Cirrus Visual, Stone Avenue Townhouses, The Arizona, Tuxon, RendezVous Urban Flats. Each of them was adopted unanimously by M&C, and each is an example of local projects, using local labor that would not have created the local jobs we’re after, but for the GPLET.
Ward 4 feels we can achieve the amendment requirements with a checklist. Read the motion – now a project such as the Stone Avenue Townhouses will have to conduct a health impact assessment, an equity assessment and will be limited to residential that is ‘attainable-affordable housing.’ That means the project will not happen.
Ward 2 simply asked me ‘what are we supposed to do, get rid of the GPLET?’ Um, no.
Ward 1 is authentic. I give her high marks for that.
I’m told that in exchanges members of the business community had with City staff and ‘council members’ the day after the vote, the impression has been left that the amendments do not apply to the GPLET. That’s not what the motion says, so either whichever council members and staff said that are playing games with Council Member Santa Cruz, just humoring her during the vote with the intention of changing things later, or the business community is being lied to. One or the other must be true if the representations being made to them were serious.
In order to use the GPLET your project must increase the value of the property you’re developing by at least 100%. That’s a high bar for local developers. Adding onto that the requirements contained in the amendments place those projects at risk. That’s an unnecessary and unacceptable requirement, one that led me to vote against the motion.
We’ll see how if at all the amendment is clarified or changed, but as it stands it harms the very projects we’re trying to help. I don’t believe in voting for something and hoping to fix it later. Let’s get it right the first time. Others on the M&C have expressed concern over our voting on last-minute motions that we haven’t had the time to discuss and evaluate the impact of. This one certainly should have been an example of that.
Local Tucson
I have two Local Tucson items this week – one is to congratulate new Job Path director Ana Greif. Job Path’s mission is to provide job skills to students so they can increase their own earning potential. Ana has worked at Pima College with a focus on building relationships with local employers. That’s going to fit in perfectly with her new role at Job Path. She also worked in Pima’s ‘tuition reimbursement program’ - a bridge to accessing education that many students must have. Ana has a Business Administration bachelors from the UA, a Master’s in Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon and is working on her Doctorate through Johns Hopkins. Welcome to Job Path. We at Ward 6 look forward to a long and positive relationship with Ana and her colleagues.
The second Local Tucson is recognizing the Tucson Botanical Gardens for being named a 2020 Traveler’s Choice Best of the Best winner. Last week I told you about the Presidio being named. This makes two Ward 6 national winners. Trip Advisor’s 2020 award puts both TBG and the Presidio in the top 10% of attractions worldwide. Congratulations to both. Make your plans to visit. Both are outdoors, and both are following the safety standards issued by the Pima County Health Department.
|
 |
|
Be Kind
Thanks to Judi from West University for sharing this photo below. It’s a shot of a pop-up that suddenly appeared in their 7th Ave/4th Street traffic circle to commemorate the Jewish New Year.
The invitation is for people to hang paper pomegranates that contain wishes for a better world. I’d be happy with a better Tucson in ‘21. Given what a drag 2020 has been, I’ll admit that’s not a real high bar.
|
The WUNA pomegranates encourage us to perform good deeds. The opportunity to do that is easy to find if you keep an eye out. I do a song by Jewel called Hands. One line is ‘in the end, only Kindness matters.’ That fits with this display in the traffic circle.
|
COVID Raw Data
Last week I said we’d pass 5,500 COVID deaths in Arizona this past week. Here’s the data I pulled from the State site on Sunday afternoon.
 And drilling down to Pima County, we’re now over 25,000 cases, and inching closer to 700 deaths from COVID this year.
 And I know from talking to many of you that K-12 attendance is still a hot issue. Last week the State had Pima County listed as meeting all of the benchmarks for reopening. That has now changed.
Nearly all of the Counties in Arizona are listed in a hybrid learning mode. I’ve been critical of the State’s data sets on their K-12 site for being too far behind the actual trend lines. It appears they’re catching up, and the recent UA area experience has finally made it to the State recommendations.
Here’s your weekly update on the Statewide COVID numbers, by County. From last week’s newsletter:
 And here are the numbers from AZDHS as of last weekend:
And for your own research – these links:
For the NY Times data sets, use this link:
The State Department of Health site is at this link: www.azdhs.gov.
And here’s the UA daily update link. www.covid.arizona.edu. When it opens, click ‘See Latest Updates’ and it’ll take you to a screen with the updated data.
Sincerely,
Steve Kozachik
Council Member, Ward 6
ward6@tucsonaz.gov
City of Tucson Resources
|
