Statement on Board Action in Recorder Heap vs. Board of Supervisors
The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors voted to seek a stay in a recent court ruling affecting our elections. A stay of proceedings is a legal tool that pauses a case for a period of time. If the stay is denied, the Board authorizes our attorney to file an appeal. I voted yes and here’s why:
Since early voting starts this week for the May 19th jurisdictional elections and the primary election was moved up to July, now is not the time for unclear or rushed changes. Conflicting state statutes between the Recorder’s and Board of Supervisor’s election duties still remain and have created uncertainty about roles in election administration. Long-time election employees fear they are at risk of being held in contempt of court for merely carrying out election duties that are essential to running secure and smooth elections. Dividing up an intertwined IT system between the Board and the Recorder’s office takes time. Rushing changes in the midst of an election cycle risks confusion and litigation.
A stay gives us time to clarify responsibilities and ensure any changes are implemented thoughtfully.
If the lower court judge denies our motion for a stay, the only other viable option is to file an appeal.
The Board of Supervisors has tried in good faith to settle our differences with Recorder Heap outside of court. It is Recorder Heap that chose to sue the Board last June.
The goal is simple: secure, efficient elections that voters can trust. I will continue to work toward that goal.
|
