![]() |
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)Question 1: Answer: Each City Council member would be met with an actual conflict of interest due to the budget containing a line item for their own stipend. The City Council members would need to publicly announce the nature of their actual conflicts of interest prior to considering the budget adoption. After declaring their conflicts, the City Council members could then discuss and vote on the budget, as provided by ORS 244.120(2)(b)(C).
Question 2: Answer: It depends. So long as they are not met with other conflicts of interest, the County Commissioners could participate in discussion, debate, or votes on the sections of the budget that do not include their own salary. Prior to discussion, debate, or votes on the section of the budget that includes their own salary, or if the entire budget is being considered, the Commissioners would need to declare the nature of their actual conflicts of interest. It is important to remember that because the Commissioners will review the budget over the course of several meetings, the Commissioners are required to declare their actual conflict of interest at each meeting where their compensation is discussed. As a best practice, Commission staff recommends declaring a conflict of interest at the beginning of a meeting because often meetings do not go as planned, agenda orders change, or topics are brought up in places that a public official might not expect.
Question 3: Answer: Yes. The Budget Committee member would be met with an actual conflict of interest related to the budget because it includes a fund that would provide a financial benefit to their relative. Because the Budget Committee will provide a recommended budget for the City Council to adopt, the Budget Committee member could utilize the provisions in ORS 244.120(2)(b)(C) to participate in budget deliberations and the vote to recommend the budget to the City Council. At each Budget Committee meeting, prior to discussion of the budget, the Budget Committee member would need to declare the nature of their actual conflict of interest. After stating the nature of their actual conflict of interest, the Budget Committee member could discuss and deliberate the budget and vote to recommend the budget to the City Council.
Question 4: Answer: No. The exception can only be used to adopt local budgets. Voting to approve a stipend is not the same as voting to approve a local budget.
Question 5: Answer: No. The exception in ORS 244.120(2)(b)(C) does not apply to voting on the adoption or approval of new compensation or benefits. Thus, the school board members would be met with actual conflicts of interest and could not use the exception to participate in discussion, debate, or votes on the adoption of new stipends for themselves.
Question 6: Answer: Yes, the board president could participate in the budget adoption after publicly announcing the nature of their conflict of interest.
Question 7: Answer: No: The exception in ORS 244.120(2)(b)(C) does not apply to household members. If the board president’s roommate is a household member, the exception would not apply.
Question 8: Answer: No. The exception is ORS 244.120(2)(b)(C) does not apply to contracts held by the public official or their relatives. It only applies to compensation or benefits provided by the public body. In this situation, the board president would need to declare the nature of their actual conflict of interest and abstain from discussion or vote on the budget that includes money for their spouse’s contract. Question 9: Answer: Local Budget Law is found in ORS 294.305 to 294.565. Commission staff cannot determine whether a public body’s budget qualifies as a “local budget” when responding to requests for advice. A public official should consult with their entity’s legal counsel if they have questions about whether their budget qualifies as a “local budget” as described in ORS 294.305 to 294.565. Return to Ethics Matters Newsletter
|