|
Wednesday 26 March
Today (26 March), the independent review of the technology that supported our transformation has been published on our website. The report sets out that:
- The primary cause of our technology failure was a failed organisational transformation.
- The regulatory platform and the provider portal are salvageable but require substantial development and rebuilding work.
Read the executive summary or full report.
Aim of the review
Peter Gill, an independent IT expert, was asked to carry out the review by our Chief Executive, Julian Hartley.
The review considered 2 key questions:
- How and why did we get to the point where the technology is causing such significant organisational disruption?
- Can we continue with the technology as it is? If so, what needs to be done to make it fit for purpose? If not, how do we get the right technology in place as quickly as possible?
Peter spoke with over 100 colleagues from across the organisation as well as design and delivery partners and conducted an in-depth analysis of documentation about how our technology systems were designed and delivered.
Findings
The report clearly sets out the scale of the problems that resulted in the failure of our technology and the impact that transformation had across the organisation. They include:
- Technical issues with the way the regulatory platform and provider portal function, resulting in multiple challenges including, for example, an overly complex assessment process, a poor user experience in registration, low use of the provider portal for notifications, and challenges with data quality.
- Poor decision-making and major failures in governance – for example eroding of sector expertise, siloed working, and a lack of adherence to industry standards.
- Fundamental cultural issues, as concerns were raised and colleagues did not believe they were listened to. This was reported to have a negative mental and physical health impact on colleagues. Data was also not given the importance it should have.
- The total spend on the regulatory transformation programme, which includes the regulatory platform and the provider portal, has been £99 million from inception in July 2019 to date. The vast majority of the benefits expected to be delivered have not yet been achieved.
- Parts of the regulatory platform are working well. These are mainly in the customer contact area used by NCSC, for example richer data capture, time-saving automation of some processes, and the ability to connect and view different data and information in one place.
Recommendations
There are 23 recommendations, which can be grouped in 5 broad areas. They reflect what is needed as part of rebuilding CQC, and redeveloping the regulatory platform and the provider portal:
- Culture
- Governance
- Operating model
- Change management
- Data and Digital.
Our Board welcomes and accepts the recommendations.
The report recommends that CQC “retains Microsoft Dynamics 365 as a strategic asset” and concludes that the regulatory platform and the provider portal are salvageable. It sets out that the systems will require substantial development and rebuilding work and that this should be done by CQC colleagues with some additional support.
The recommendations also cover the need to:
- Develop a culture where data is seen as critical and strategically important.
- Ensure robust governance and clear roles and responsibilities.
- Extensively engage with and involve users, internally and externally. This includes putting in place additional ways to ensure the concerns and feedback of CQC colleagues and external partners are listened to and acted on.
- Follow best practice and industry standards.
The full recommendations can be found in the report on our website.
|