Industrial Stormwater News

Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a webpage.
Industrial Stormwater A8

Welcome to the Industrial Stormwater Program June 2011 Newsletter! 


In this issue: 

  • Monitoring Begins: Forms, Tips and Suggestions
  • Compliance Updates
  • One Year Later: Lessons Learned For Permittees
  • Goodbye from the Stormwater Manager

Monitoring Begins: Forms, Tips and Suggestions

Improved website offers expanded information access

In response to requests for more compliance information available electronically, increased accessibility and data transparency, the MPCA is expanding its online information services. This tool provides permittees, trade associations, consultants, and others easier access to the industrial stormwater program’s required permit documents and monitoring report forms.
  • View a list of applicants who applied for permit coverage or certified for the No Exposure Exclusion (sortable by county, sector, city, facility name and other search options)
  • View and confirm industrial stormwater application information, and if necessary, download the forms to modify/change application data, or terminate permit coverage altogether
  • View facility-specific monitoring calendars, allowing the permittee to understand exactly when stormwater samples must be collected and submitted
  • Download a copy of the permit coverage card and/or cover letter
  • View monitoring data results, once submitted
 Here are a couple of tips and suggestions when using this new online tool:
  • Select “active” as a status type to see a list of all active facilities
  • Not sure of the facility name? Enter just a few letters of the facility name to populate a list
  • Leave all fields blank to get a list of all facilities
MONITORING REPORT FORMS AVAILABLE ONLINE ONLY!

Permittees who want a paper copy of the monitoring report forms mailed out to them or have questions about this new tool can call (651) 757-2119 or (800) 657-3804 (non-metro only) or email: iswprogram.pca@state.mn.us.

Monitoring Tips and Suggestions

The Industrial Stormwater Multi-Sector General Permit was issued a year ago, and for many facilities, benchmark monitoring begins this year. If you have not already started monitoring at your facility, now is the time to prepare. The better prepared you are, the more successful your chances of collecting samples correctly. 
Before collecting samples:
  • Contact your preferred lab to make sure they can accept and process your samples
  • Consider conducting a mock collection opportunity (without actually collecting a sample).  This simple step can greatly improve your actual sample collection process. 
When collecting samples:
  • Safety is the highest priority. Do not endanger yourself to collect stormwater samples.
  • Take notes of site conditions, such as weather, soil, discoloration in the stormwater discharges, etc., right before or during sample collection.
  • Make sure samples are collected when stormwater is flowing; stagnant water will not give a representative sample.
  • Keep the sample jar lid in a place where it won’t be accidentally contaminated. Do not place it on the ground or in your pocket as it could contaminate your sample.
For additional information about stormwater monitoring, visit the Industrial Stormwater Program webpage. To learn what parameters to monitor for and when, view the following tools:

Compliance Updates:

No Exposure Flyovers

Recently, MPCA staff conducted industrial stormwater compliance inspections from an unusual perspective: an airplane. Offering multi-site visits in a short period of time, the recent fly-over inspections targeted No Exposure certifiers. The results? Many of the facilities observed DO have exposure and DO NOT meet the No Exposure certification requirements. Facing potential enforcement action, these facilities will have to either make facility modifications to meet and maintain the No Exposure exclusion status, or apply for permit coverage. More fly-over inspections are being planned. If your facility has certified for No Exposure, review the No Exposure: Qualifying For, and Maintaining, the Exclusion fact sheet to ensure you’re meeting all requirements.
no exposure
This facility claimed to be eligible for the No Exposure certification which excludes the facility from the requirements of the industrial stormwater Multi-Sector General Permit. The activities and materials being conducted outdoors in the photo above that are circled in red are examples of exposure that require permit coverage.

Terminating “old” permits

Nearly 90 percent of facilities that previously had industrial stormwater permit coverage before April 2010 have applied for the “new” Multi-Sector General Permit or terminated coverage because they no longer have met the applicability requirements.

To help the remaining 10 percent stay in compliance, the Agency sent them reminder letters in January 2011, to apply for or terminate permit coverage. In May 2011, the agency terminated permit coverage for those that still hadn’t re-applied.

The Agency made one more effort and sent an e-mail to the remaining facilities notifying them that they may be out of compliance. The effort was effective: many facilities, including those which had not applied for coverage and were required to, or failed to terminate coverage after activities ceased, re-established contact with the industrial stormwater program.

One Year Later: Lessons Learned for Permittees

Since the Industrial Stormwater Multi-Sector General Permit was issued in April 2010, the Industrial Stormwater Program would like to offer a few compliance tips for permittees based on the lessons staff have learned during the past year:

Annual report:
  • Monthly inspections: monthly inspections are required for all facilities, and the results must be summarized within the annual report. Be sure to conduct them monthly and use the MPCA’s Site Inspection Form. Read parts III.F of the Multi-Sector General Permit for more information.
  • Most facilities have sector-specific inspection requirements and permittees need to review Part VII of the permit to comply with these requirements. Visit Step 7: Sector-specific requirements, guidance of the Steps to Compliance for more information.
  • Newly listed impaired waters: Every facility must conduct an annual review to determine if they are discharging to a newly listed impaired water.  Type in your facility address on the “Maps of Impaired Waters” page to locate nearby impaired waters.
  • Monitoring: the annual report does not require any monitoring information to be provided; those details are provided either on the Stormwater Monitoring Report Form for Benchmark Monitoring, or Discharge Monitoring Report Form for Effluent Monitoring.
Monitoring:
  • About two percent of all permittees have effluent monitoring requirements. Are you one of them? If so, effluent monitoring is a once-per-year requirement for every calendar year of the permit’s term. In 2010, a number of facilities did not send in Discharge Monitoring Report forms, or sampled the wrong parameters. Visit Step 7: Sector-specific requirements, guidance of the Steps to Compliance for more information, or, to determine whether your facility is required to conduct effluent monitoring.
Sector-specific requirements: 
  • Facility owner/operators may be unaware that their industrial sector has permit requirements pertaining to that sector. Visit Step 7: Sector-specific requirements, guidance of the Steps to compliance section of the Web site for more information.

Saying goodbye from the Stormwater Manager

As the MPCA Stormwater program manager for the past 4 ½ years, and a water veteran of 35 years, I was asked to share a few parting thoughts before my June 30 retirement.

Stormwater management and regulation in Minnesota have changed considerably since my first small involvements with stormwater in 1998. Before federal and state regulation of stormwater, cities, watershed districts, and others had already been making changes to factor water quality protection into stormwater management.

Much more progress has been made since, Yet many challenges lie ahead.Minnesota’s abundant water resources are under increased pressure. The last century saw profound improvements in the quality of many water bodies as the result of modern wastewater treatment. But as the focus has shifted to more widespread pollution sources that affect far more of our waters, we’ve seen mixed results—water quality improvements in some cases, further degradation in others. Ultimately that puts big parts of Minnesota’s economy and quality of life at risk.

In the face of these challenges, how will we respond? Let’s begin with continued reliance on all parties--the private sector, local governments and others--to keep innovating, partnering, self-policing and tightening up stormwater management practices. Let’s continue to improve our regulatory, compliance, technical and administrative systems in a world where cumbersome tools and practices have an ever-diminishing place. Above all we should focus on preventing and eliminating pollution at the source, vs. over-reliance on transporting it to treatment. This translates into a long list of practices such as green stormwater infrastructure, sustainable development, retaining precipitation where it lands, volume control, securing future maintenance and eliminating discharges altogether through no-exposure and the like, along with continuous improvement, research and knowledge sharing.

Beyond that, we’ll have to improve our ability to manage pollutant sources that number in the thousands or more and to effectively reach larger numbers of people who control those sources.

Finally, we must focus our efforts where they make the biggest difference. One key way to accomplish these aims will be watershed-based management—focusing our efforts on those sources and priority areas within an individual watershed that matter most to the water quality of that watershed.

The good news is that we have key assets to build on. Not least of these are the many leaders and innovators in local government, the private sector and a world-class stormwater research and training capacity at the University of Minnesota that didn’t exist 10 years ago. Moreover, much of the public highly values Minnesota’s waters. We in the stormwater management community need never apologize about our work to protect those waters.
We’ve done a great deal already to pull together our many areas of strength, work collaboratively and build ever better systems, practices, tools, regulation, enforcement and voluntary measures. That continues to be the path forward. It’s how we will maximize our stormwater management contribution to preserving and cleaning up our waters.

Thanks for the opportunity to work with you, best wishes, and much success.   ~Don Jakes