Government Personnel Data Remote Workshop
The Data Practices Office will be hosting a Dos and Don'ts of Government Personnel Data remote workshop on Wednesday, September 25 from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. that provides an overview of the Data Practices Acts requirements related to personnel data under section 13.43. The workshop includes:
- Background information on classifications of data about government employees
- Requirements for data related to employee investigations and discipline
- An opportunity to apply your knowledge in hands-on exercises
The workshop will be held remotely on WebEx, and it will not require in-person attendance. The cost to attend this workshop is $250 per person.
Registration information for this workshop is available on our website.
Entity Response to Challenge to Accuracy and Completeness of Data
In Advisory Opinion 24-001, a data subject asked whether the Department of Human Services complied with section 13.04, subd. 4 when it extended a deadline to respond to a challenge that data about him were accurate and complete. The Commissioner noted that section 13.04, subd. 4(c) requires a government entity to respond to a data challenge within 30 days by either correcting the disputed data or informing the data subject that it has determined the data are correct. The plain language of the subdivision does not permit an entity to extend this 30-day deadline. Therefore, the Commissioner opined that DHS did not comply with the Data Practices Act when it extended the deadline to respond to the data subject's challenge.
Data Access Policies
In Advisory Opinion 24-002, a member of the public asked whether a city responded appropriately to a request for its data access policies. The Commissioner opined that the city did not respond appropriately because it appeared that the city did not have data access policies at the time of the request from the member of the public.
Elected Officials' Correspondence
In Advisory Opinion 24-003, a school district asked whether emails and similar written correspondence regarding school district business that were sent between school board members were classified as private data under Minnesota Statutes, section 13.601, subdivision 2. The Commissioner opined that the private classification under section 13.601, subd. 2 applied to communications between elected officials and members of the public rather than just between elected officials. Additionally, section 13.601, subd. 2 does not apply to elected officials' correspondence when they are communicating in an official capacity. Therefore, school board members' emails are presumptively public unless specific data are classified as not public under another section of the Data Practices Act, other state statute, or federal law.
|