FYi Newsletter - July 2023

FYi Newsletter – From the Data Practices Office at the Department of Administration


JULY 2023

Update Your Data Access Policies by August 1

Minnesota Statutes, section 13.025 requires all government entities subject to the Data Practices Act to create policies about access to public data as well as the rights of data subject. The law also requires government entities to review and update these policies by August 1 of each year.

This is our friendly reminder to data practices officials to review and update your entity's data access policies by the August 1 deadline. The Data Practices Office website has sample policies and a guidance worksheet to help you consider different factors to keep your policies up to date.


The Data Practices Office Has Moved!

The Data Practices Office has moved back to the Administration Building near the State Capitol as part of the Department of Administration's process to modernize its work environment.

Going forward, you can send any physical correspondence to the Data Practices Office at: 200 Administration Building, 50 Sherburne Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55155.

You can also find the new address on our Contact Us webpage.

As always, the quickest way to get in touch with our office is by email at info.dpo@state.mn.us or by phone at 651-296-6733.


Upcoming Data Practices Trainings

Legislative Update & Data Practices Potpourri Webinar on July 13

The Data Practices Office will be offering a free webinar on Thursday, July 13 at 11 a.m. to highlight changes the Minnesota Legislature made to data practices statutes and the Open Meeting Law during the 2023 legislative session.

We will also discuss recent questions our office has received and hold a live Q&A session.

More information about this free webinar is available on our website, and you can view recordings of past webinars on our YouTube Channel.


Advisory Opinion Updates

Data Subject Requests

In Advisory Opinion 23-001, a data subject asked whether a joint powers entity responded appropriately to a data subject request when it did not provide responsive data within 10 business days. The Commissioner opined that the entity did not respond appropriately. She encouraged government entities to discuss the requirements of section 13.04 with contractors and IT personnel to ensure data subject requests are responded to within the required time frame.


Case Law Updates

1300 Nicollet, LLC v. County of Hennepin, A22-0671 (Minn., May 17, 2023)

Relator 1300 Nicollet, while appealing Hennepin County's valuations of its property to the Minnesota Tax Court, moved to compel discovery of assessor data on competitor properties, which were classified as private or nonpublic under Minnesota Statutes, section 13.51, subdivision 5. For not public data to be discoverable under section 13.03, subdivision 6, a court must find the data first to be discoverable under the appropriate court rules and then determine whether the benefit to the party seeking access to not public data outweighs any confidentiality interests the entity has in the data. Looking at the first point of analysis under section 13.03, subd. 6, the tax court determined data on competitor properties were not discoverable under the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedures 26.02(b), finding that the benefit of releasing these not public data was marginal and did not outweigh the burden of disclosure on the County. A second smaller set of data, data that the county assessor used to complete his appraisal, were found to be discoverable. For these data, the tax court then reviewed the second part of the test outlined in section 13.03, subd. 6, to determine that the benefit to 1300 Nicollet in releasing these data outweighed the confidentiality interest of the other parties. This set of assessor data was provided to 1300 Nicollet.

1300 Nicollet then appealed the Minnesota Tax Court's determination that the larger set of assessor data on competitor properties were not discoverable. The Supreme Court considered whether the tax court abused its discretion in making the discovery determinations. 1300 Nicollet argued that the Supreme Court's decision in G&I IX OIC LLC v. County of Hennepin, 979 N.W.2d 52 (Minn. 2022), which discussed Minnesota Statutes, section 278.05, subdivision 3, compelled the tax court to mandate discovery of assessor records. The Supreme Court clarified that its decision in G&I merely "preclude[d] the tax court from denying discoverability solely because data are confidential or nonpublic." The balancing test to determine discoverability of not public data in section 13.03, subd. 6 still applies. The Supreme Court determined the tax court did not abuse its discretion when the lower court determined the data were not discoverable due to the proportionality of the request and permitted discovery of not public assessor data that were used in the appraisal. As a result, the Supreme Court affirmed the tax court's decision alongside an additional issue involving appraisal calculations.