Office of Legislative Affairs - "The Friday Wrap-Up"

 

 
  Subscribe   |   Unsubscribe
CEO/Office of Legislative Affairs - The Friday Wrap-Up
June 6, 2025 Volume 11 Issue 22
 
Board Actions

The Board of Supervisors will meet on June 10, 2025 at 9:30 am. Notable actions include the following:

Public Hearings

General Administration

3. County Executive Office - Hold Public Hearing to consider adoption of FY 2025-26 Recommended Budget - All Districts

The next Board of Supervisors meeting is scheduled for June 10, 2025, at 9:30 am.

 
Table of Contents
orange arrow Board Actions
orange arrow County Legislation Position
orange arrow Sacramento Update
orange arrow Washington D.C. Update
orange arrow Weekly Clips
dotted line
 
County Legislation Position

 
dotted line
 
Sacramento Update
Prepared by Precision Advocacy

June 6 is the house of origin deadline, and the legislature has spent the last 2 weeks passing legislation from one house to the other. Since May 26, approximately 900 bills have been considered - about 400 in the Senate and 500 in the Assembly. Bills that do not move out of their house of origin will be designated 2-year bills and will not be considered again until next year, with some exceptions, such as bills with an urgency clause which do not have to abide by the same deadlines. Next week, lawmakers will return to their regular policy committee schedule focusing on legislation from the other side of the legislature. This is typically when measures face the most hurdles - as they are scrutinized more carefully by their colleagues in the other chamber. Policy committee hearings will wrap up by July 18 when the legislature will adjourn for 4 weeks for summer recess. Once they return from recess, fiscal committees will move bills to the full Senate or Assembly for consideration, the legislature will break on September 12, and Governor Gavin Newsom will have until October 12 to sign or veto legislation.

Budget negotiations are progressing, and we anticipate that the joint Senate and Assembly budget agreement will be announced early next week. That agreement will be released in budget bills on June 11 or 12 and legislators will send the budget to the governor on June 14 or 15. At that point, serious negotiations will proceed with the administration. Although the legislature is largely opposed to many of the governor's proposed cuts - particularly to immigrant health care - they are struggling to come up with alternative ways to balance the budget. The budget will continue to evolve as anticipated federal cuts emerge, and there is a likelihood that the legislature will have to return to Sacramento after their adjournment in September for a special session on the budget.

 

LOSSAN Rail Corridor Resiliency Informational Hearing

The Senate Transportation Committee held an informational hearing on LOSSAN Rail corridor resiliency last week in Los Angeles, chaired by Senator Catherine Blakespear (D-Encinitas) and attended by Senators Maria Elena Durazo (D-Los Angeles), Monique Limón (D-Santa Barbara), and Laura Richardson (D-Inglewood). The hearing included two panels: one focused on planning for the 2026 World Cup and 2028 Olympics, and another focused on long-term challenges and planning for the LOSSAN corridor.

The 351-mile Los Angeles – San Diego – San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor (LOSSAN Corridor) runs through a six-county coastal region in Southern California and is the second busiest intercity passenger rail corridor in the United States and the busiest state-supported Amtrak route. The LOSSAN Corridor service includes 41 stations and more than 150 daily passenger trains, with an annual ridership of nearly 3 million on Amtrak Pacific Surfliner intercity trains and 5 million on Metrolink and COASTER commuter trains. The corridor has faced persistent landslide issues that have shut down parts of the route and have utilized bus bridges while the tracks are being fixed.

Preparing for the World Cup and Olympic Games. The first panel featured Paul Krekorian, Executive Director of the City of Los Angeles Office of Major Events; and Chad Edison, Chief Deputy Secretary of Rail and Transit at the California State Transportation Agency. Mr. Krekorian emphasized the size and scale of the 2028 Olympics, which are expected to have 15 million ticketed spectators and 5 million distinct visitors. In addition to transporting spectators to and from venues and hotels, the greater region will also be managing everyday traffic amidst road closures and a greater volume of vehicles.

The committee discussed the regional nature of the LOSSAN rail and its importance in public transportation in the region. Legislators commented that each county has its own public transportation system that does not cross county boundaries. This doesn’t harmonize with how people live and work in the greater region. LOSSAN is one of the only ways for people to take public transit to an event in a neighboring county.

Mr. Edison highlighted that the state is focused on expanding rail service capacity between now and 2028 by about 40%. A connection between LAX Airport and Union Station will be opening next week. 10 zero emission hydrogen fuel trains are being built and added to the fleet by the end of 2027, and the new hydrogen trains will have seating capacity for over 200 seats. Legacy equipment from CalTrain is also being added for extra capacity during the games. Increased frequency of trains was also discussed as a priority.

Legislators spoke in support of LOSSAN offering more frequent service and increasing their capacity for the Olympics and beyond. Panelists and legislators discussed customer-facing communications to educate people about their public transportation options during the games, so as to persuade more people to forgo a rental car and decrease vehicle traffic on freeways, as well as prioritizing safety and cleanliness for the benefit of consumers and operators.

Challenges and Planning. The second panel, “Navigating Challenges and Planning for Success,” began with Jennifer Gress Ph.D., Division Chief for the Sustainable Transportation and Communities Division, California Air Resources Board, discussing how LOSSAN fits into the state clean energy and climate change goals. She lauded the investments that have been made in LOSSAN with quality-of-life benefits for residents and a successful alternative to driving.

Frank Jimenez, Senior Fiscal and Policy Analyst, from the Legislative Analyst’s Office gave an overview of California’s rail system, including freight rail, intercity rail, regional rail, urban rail, and high-speed rail. During the pandemic, ridership on state-supported rail routes declined, leading to a decrease in fare revenues. While ridership levels have started to recover, they remain below pre-pandemic levels. State-supported intercity rail routes received limited-term federal relief to help maintain operations, but as these sources wind down, it compounds the fiscal pressure of lower ridership numbers. Climate change impacts are also expected to add cost pressures to public rail operations, with the erosion issues on the LOSSAN line being a good example. As part of his presentation, he explored various funding and resources that the legislature could invest in rail lines, all of which come with trade-offs as the state faces increasing fiscal pressures itself. He noted that fare revenue has generally supported rail service at around 50-70%.

Jacob Wasserman, Research Program Manager from UCLA, talked about the benefits of high-speed rail and electrification but reminded committee members that LOSSAN carries only 1% of ridership in corridor counties. He emphasized that the bus is still the real workhorse of the greater Los Angeles and San Diego areas. He also highlighted the challenges with right of ways on freight owned lines.

Jonathan Stewart, Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering from UCLA highlighted some of the technical aspects of the earthquake and landslide induced hazards that plague LOSSAN. Climate change is expected to make these hazards worse and more frequent over time. Mr. Stewart recommended additional monitoring and regional mapping to help address the issue.

Chair Blakespear ended the hearing saying she remains committed to uplifting and supporting rail services along the LOSSAN corridor and across the state particularly in preparation for so many major events, emphasizing that “we must meet the urgency of this moment.” Background materials for the hearing may be found at the links below.

 

Assembly Insurance Committee Informational Hearing on the FAIR Plan

The Assembly Committee on Insurance held an informational oversight hearing on the state’s FAIR Plan last week intended to evaluate the current and future state of the FAIR plan, following the Pacific Palisades and Eaton Fires. The hearing was chaired by Assemblymember Lisa Calderon (D-Industry) and attended by Assemblymembers Heather Hadwick (R-Jackson) and Josh Harabedian (D-Pasadena). Victoria Roach, President of the California FAIR Plan gave the primary testimony for the hearing.

Background on the FAIR Plan. The California FAIR Plan – “Fair Access to Insurance Requirements” – is an association of all insurance companies licensed by the California Department of Insurance (CDI) that provides basic property and casualty insurance in California. It was created in 1968, following urban disturbances, notably the Watts Riots in Los Angeles. Initially developed as a short-term solution for urban areas that were underserved by the private insurance market, the Plan has since grown to cover large rural, suburban, and urban areas that are at high risk for fires and other natural disasters. The FAIR Plan is funded primarily through the policies it sells to customers, it is not a state agency, and is not subject to Proposition 103, the Insurance Rate Reduction and Reform Act.

FAIR Plan policies are capped at $3.3 million for residential properties and $20 million per structure (up to $100 million) for commercial properties. These caps were increased by the Insurance Commissioner in 2020 for residential and 2023 for commercial. Commercial went from $8.4 million per location in 2021, to $20 million per location in 2023, to $20 million per structure subsequently in 2023 (finalized in 2024). FAIR Plan commercial policies can cover homeowners’ associations, condo associations, farms, and businesses.

Sustainable Insurance Strategy. While the Insurance Commissioner has made significant efforts to depopulate the FAIR Plan through his Sustainable Insurance Strategy and move consumers to the private market, the FAIR Plan’s market share continues to grow. As of March 2025, the FAIR Plan’s total exposure in California is $599 billion, reflecting a 31% increase since September 2024 and a 259% increase since September 2021. As of March 2025, the FAIR Plan’s policies in force reached 573,739, a 23% increase since September 2024 and a 139% increase since September 2021.

Ms. Roach highlighted the FAIR Plan’s financial exposure following the historic fires in Los Angeles earlier this year including about $4 billion in the Pacific Palisades and about $775 million in Eaton. Previous exposure maps provided to the Assembly Insurance Committee by the FAIR Plan never showed Pacific Palisades as high concentration, but total exposure in 2024 grew to about $5.9 billion. For comparison, Lake Arrowhead in San Bernardino, one of the Plan’s most concentrated areas of policyholders, has about  $7.7 billion in exposure.

While in theory, consumers should first look for insurance in the private market, the FAIR Plan is increasingly the first place consumers turn to because of non-renewal notices and increasingly expensive insurance. Recent legislation has attempted to encourage consumers to return to the private market including using commercial insurance clearinghouses, but these efforts have been unsuccessful in slowing the growth of the FAIR Plan or incentivizing private insurers to underwrite more of the California market. Adding to the impetus for consumers to get insurance through the FAIR Plan, recently the rates of the FAIR Plan have come under scrutiny as being equal to or in some cases lower than the admitted market.

FAIR Plan Assessment. Following the Southern California fires earlier this year, the FAIR Plan issued its first assessment in more than 30 years. On February 11, 2025, the FAIR Plan requested and received approval to assess its member companies for $1 billion. The assessment allowed the FAIR Plan to meet their claims obligations. The FAIR Plan Modernization Plan allows FAIR Plan member insurers to potentially recoup part of the $1 billion assessment from non-FAIR Plan policyholders. If approved by the Insurance Commissioner, recoupments would show as a temporary supplemental fee to policyholders and could be recouped over a 24-month period. Whether or not FAIR Plan member companies can pass on a temporary supplemental fee to their policyholders is currently being litigated.

Current Legislation. Current legislation, AB 226 (Calderon & Alvarez), supported by the county, would create the FAIR Plan Stabilization Act, and would authorize the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, upon the request of the California Fair Access to Insurance Requirements Plan to issue bonds to finance the costs of claims, to increase liquidity, and claims-paying capacity of the FAIR Plan, and to refund bonds previously issued for that purpose. The bill is currently pending in the Senate Business and Professions Committee, and is in part a response to the financial constraints faced by the FAIR Plan following the fires.

In her testimony, Ms. Roach indicated the somewhat precarious financial position the Plan would be in if another catastrophic fire occurs this year in an area with a high concentration of FAIR Plan participants.

 

Grant Opportunities

Below is a list of the latest grant opportunities released by the state. All opportunities for local jurisdictions may be found here.

 

Application Deadline: N/A

Title: California Advanced Services Fund: Broadband Adoption Account – January 2026 Cycle

State Agency / Department: Public Utilities Commission

Match Funding? 15%

Estimated Total Funding: $36,385,000

Funding Method: Reimbursement(s)

 

Application Deadline: Closed

Title: 2025 Clean Water Act Section 319 Nonpoint Source Pollution Grant

State Agency / Department:

Match Funding? 25%

Estimated Total Funding:$4,500,000

Funding Method: Reimbursement(s)

 

Governor’s Press Releases

Below is a list of the governor’s press releases beginning May 28.

June 4: TOMORROW: Governor Newsom to make announcement on literacy and student success

June 4: New data shows California is adding more clean energy capacity to the grid faster than ever before

June 4: California’s strong gun safety laws continue to save lives

June 4: California leads the nation — again — with most Fortune 500 companies

June 3: Governor Newsom warns of unnecessary danger following CMS reversal of emergency protections for pregnant women in crisis

June 3: Governor Newsom announces appointments

  • Alana Mathews, of Elk Grove, has been appointed Deputy Secretary of Enforcement and General Counsel at the California Environmental Protection Agency
  • Edward Fenn, of Boulder City, Nevada, has been appointed Chief of Construction at the California High Speed Rail Authority
  • Joanna Rees, of Healdsburg, has been appointed to the California Workforce Development Board
  • Angel Sanchez, of Riverside, has been appointed to the California Workforce Development Board

June 3: In first-of-its-kind initiative, California deploys mobile air monitoring to protect underserved communities from pollution

June 2: Update on the Golden State Plan to Counter Antisemitism

June 1: Governor Newsom and Acting Governor Kounalakis honor fallen Baldwin Park Police Officer

May 31: Governor Newsom proclaims Mental Health Awareness Month

May 30: Governor Newsom announces appointments 5.30.25

  • Connie Nakano, of Elk Grove, has been appointed Assistant Director of the Office of Strategic Initiatives and Equity at the California Department of Aging
  • Patrick Schoch, of Byron, has been appointed to the 23rd District Agricultural Association, Contra Costa County Fair Board of Directors
  • Jonathon Porter, of Tulare, has been appointed to the 24th District Agricultural Association, Tulare County Fair Board of Directors

May 30: Governor Newsom proclaims Foster Care Month 2025

May 30: Over 300 firefighting and law enforcement graduates add to state’s public safety force

May 30: “We all are going to die:” 6 catastrophic ways Trump’s Big Ugly Bill threatens Californians

May 30: Building on billions announced earlier this month, Governor Newsom makes $800 million available in new Prop 1 grants

May 30: As Trump cuts U.S. Forest Service, California deploys an extra $72 million to reduce wildfire risk and ‘rake the forest,’ fast-tracks critical projects

May 29: Ready for the summer: Governor Newsom announces lifesaving heat-ranking tool, invests $32 million to help communities combat extreme heat

May 29: Governor Newsom proclaims Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month

May 28: Governor Newsom announces appointments 5.28.25

  • LaCandice Ochoa, of Sacramento, has been appointed Deputy Director of the Independent Living and Community Access Division at the Department of Rehabilitation
  • Aaron Christian, of Chino, has been appointed Chief of Population Risk, Quality Assurance, and Data Operations at the Department of Developmental Services
  • Sherri Miller, of Sacramento, has been appointed Special Assistant to the Secretary at the California Environmental Protection Agency
  • Jason Paguio, of Coronado, has been reappointed to the Commission on Asian and Pacific Islander American Affairs
  • Rajan Gill, of Yuba City, has been reappointed to the California Commission on Asian and Pacific Islander American Affairs, where he has served since 2013

May 28: Governor Newsom issues statement on court decision affirming Trump’s tariffs as unlawful

May 28: Governor Newsom signs legislation 5.28.25

 
dotted line
 
Washington D.C. Update
Prepared by Townsend Public Affairs

LEGISLATIVE BRANCH ACTIVITY

Budget Reconciliation and the One Big Beautiful Bill Are Considered in the Senate, Key Issues Emerge

On May 22, the House passed H.R. 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), their contribution to the budget reconciliation package aimed at delivering major portions of President Donald Trump’s agenda. The bill makes permanent the lower income tax rates from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), provides $150 billion in additional defense and border funding, restarts construction of the border wall, and raises the debt limit by $4 trillion. It also includes a number of policies the President promised to deliver on the campaign trail that will expire by the end of his presidency, including a standard deduction increase for individuals (with an enhancement for seniors), a child tax credit supplement, no tax on tips and overtime, and a new deduction on interest for car loans. It also increases the State and Local Tax Deduction limit (SALT Cap) to $40,000, with an income limit of $500k.   

To offset the cost of these policies, longer-standing Republican priorities were added, including welfare program reforms affecting the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Medicaid, along with reforming student aid and federal pensions, eliminating clean energy tax credits, and rescinding funding for financial watchdogs like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.  

As the Senate begins amending the bill, the Congressional Budget Office released a new estimated cost of $3.67 trillion, with a $2.4 trillion increase in the national debt over the next 10 years. A separate letter estimated the uninsured population would rise to 16 million over the next 9 years as a result of the healthcare reforms in the bill. The cost, among other issues such as the SALT Cap, Medicaid reforms, energy tax credit phase-out, debt limit increase, and the permanence of the lowered business tax rate present the same types of competing interests Speaker Johnson had to manage to get the bill out of the House. Changes to the bill will require it to be returned to the House to be voted on again.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune has been working out some early details over the last few weeks, but major breakthroughs are yet to come. The Senate Parliamentarian has also not ruled on a number of controversial provisions which may be violative of the Byrd Rule, a part of the reconciliation process which prevents “extraneous policy riders” and non-spending/revenue provisions in reconciliation packages.  

The X-Date, the day on which the US will fully hit the debt ceiling and begin to default on its financial obligations, in mid-August, will likely drive passage of the bill before August recess. Congressional Leadership and the President have committed to July 4 as their deadline.  

Budget Reconciliation is a special legislative process which allows the Senate to bypass the filibuster and pass certain budget/spending related legislation with only 51 votes.

 

Appropriations Ongoing as House Markup Schedule Brings Forward the First Draft Language and Earmarks Lists

The Appropriations process, which provides for general operating budget authority, programmatic funding, and earmarks for federal agencies in a given fiscal year, continued on this week with the start of House markups on the Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Bill and the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies bill.

These are the first House markups based on an updated schedule announced by House Appropriations Chairman Tom Cole. As the process continues, we will see draft text inclusive of the earmark requests submitted by members of Congress last month. Representatives were generally required to post their submissions on their websites by the end of this week.

 

Recissions Package Reaches Congress, Seeks to Repeal Funding for Public Broadcasting and Foreign Aid

On June 2, the White House formally transmitted a recissions package to Congress, asking them to rescind $9.4 billion in funding for public broadcasting and foreign aid, largely codifying cuts made earlier this year without Congressional authorization as the Department of Government Efficiency Service (DOGE) effectively closed the US Agency for International Development (USAID). The President previously signed an Executive Order in early May attempting to withdraw funding from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which in part funds the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) and National Public Radio (NPR). The package asks Congress to rescind all of CBP’s budget authority as appropriated by Congress.

The first Trump Administration attempted a $15 billion recissions package in 2018, which failed in the Senate. House Speaker Mike Johnson has indicated his intention to see a floor vote in the House as early as the week of June 9, despite this the package again appears more controversial in the Senate.

Rescission packages are requests by the President to cancel all or part of allocated budget authority, specifically targeting unobligated discretionary funds provided through the appropriations process (not budget reconciliation). Under the Impoundment Control Act, the President must transmit a special message to both the House and the Senate detailing and justifying the request. Congress then has 45 calendar days to approve or amend the package, during which time the funding is impounded. If Congress fails to approve the rescissions or does not act the funding must be released. This law applies to an estimated 27% of federal spending.

 

House Passes Opioid Programs Reauthorization

HR 2483, the SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Reauthorization Act was reported out of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on May 29, and was added to the House calendar for June 4. It broadly reauthorizes programs from HR 6, the SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act (2018)/Public Law 115-271 designed to address the opioid epidemic that was signed by President Donald Trump during his first term.  

The SUPPORT Reauthorization Act would extend funding for a variety of these programs through Fiscal Year 2030, and includes over $500 million for CDC-led prevention and monitoring efforts, first responder training, behavioral health centers, and recovery and treatment programs. It also includes policy directives for the Department of Health and Human Services and the Food and Drug Administration, along with Department of Labor funding to address the workforce impacts of substance use.

 

EXECUTIVE BRANCH ACTIVITY

White House Releases More Comprehensive Budget Requests

The White House released an appendix to their “skinny” budget request for FY26 appropriations. It details the significant cuts they requested at the beginning of May to programs they have determined are not aligned with Administration priorities among other legacy programs. Similar to provisions in both the budget reconciliation bill (One Big Beautiful Bill Act) and the recissions package, the budget request seeks to codify a reduction in the size and scope of the federal government partially implemented by the Department of Government Efficiency Service (DOGE) since the beginning of the Administration.

Given the drastic nature of the proposed cuts, the request has been viewed on Capitol Hill as more of a statement of values than a substantive negotiating framework. House Republicans will release draft bill text for each of the 12 appropriations bills in advance of markups over the next 5 weeks and program funding is largely expected to remain.

 

DHS Posts and Removes a List of “Sanctuary Jurisdictions,” CDBG Letters Include Language on “Compliance with Executive Orders and Federal Law”

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) briefly posted and later removed a list of “sanctuary jurisdictions” in each state that are “defying federal immigration law.” The list was widely anticipated based on instructions provided in an April 28 executive order. The list was removed after the National Sheriffs Association published a letter objecting to the methodology used to create it and a lack of an appeals process. Multiple jurisdictions listed also responded with statements claiming they were added in error.

Per multiple executive orders and agency memos attempting to comply with them, designated jurisdictions could see attempts to withhold their federal funding or amend grant agreements to include conditions requiring proactive and/or affirmative assistance from local law enforcement in those jurisdictions in support of immigration enforcement initiatives.

Court decisions from prior years generally require the federal government not withhold so much funding that it could be considered coercive, provide proper notice before withholding that funding, and have specific and relevant legal authority endowed by Congress to withhold funding for the stated reason.

 

Elon Musk Leaves the Federal Government and the Department of Government Efficiency

Elon Musk announced his departure from the federal government on May 29. Musk was legally required to resign as a “special government employee” before July 20, when the six-month hiring authority he was contracted under would have expired.

The Department of Government Efficiency Service (DOGE), a reorganization and renaming of the US Digital Service, is expected to continue in some form after Musk’s departure, but many DOGE staffers who embedded in federal agencies to make significant cuts over the last few months have been converted to political appointees at their respective agencies. The Administration and many cabinet secretaries expressed their desire to continue DOGE’s work.

Musk publicly sought to cut up to $2 trillion in government spending in the first six months of the Trump Administration, but later lowered that number to $150 billion. DOGE oversaw a large quantity of federal layoffs and grant and contract cancellations. It has also faced controversy over how it calculated its purported savings, amassed intentionally disparate federal databases, and the way it has sought to rapidly reform agencies. Through the FY26 appropriations process, the budget reconciliation bill, and the recently delivered recissions package, it now falls to Congress to either codify or reverse many of the reforms DOGE initiated.

 

Orange County Delegation Press Releases

 

Legislation Introduced by the Orange County Delegation

Bill Number   

Bill Title   

Introduction Date   

Sponsor   

Bill Description   

Latest Major Action   

H.R.3624

Improving Mental Health Access for Students Act.

05/29/25

Rep. Lou Correa (D-CA-46)

A bill to add suicide prevention resources to school identification cards.

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce., 05/29/25

 
dotted line
 
Weekly Clips

Friday 6/6

State launches $105M grant program to help fire victims pay mortgages -- Residents can apply starting June 12 for cash to make three months of loan payments on homes lost in the LA wildfires and other recent disasters. Jeff Collins in the Orange County Register -- 06/06/25

California wages jumped 6.5% last year, 5th biggest raises in US -- But employment grew just 0.5% over 12 months, ranking a middling No. 28 among the states. Jonathan Lansner in the San Jose Mercury -- 06/06/25

 

Thursday 6/5

State lawmakers considering policy changes after L.A. wildfires -- Nearly six months after a firestorm ravaged communities across Los Angeles, California lawmakers are crafting legislation to try to protect the state insurance program for high-risk homes from financial collapse. Sandra McDonald in the Los Angeles Times -- 06/05/25

California court says holding phone for maps while driving is illegal -- California law prohibits “operating” a mobile phone while driving. And that makes it illegal for a driver to hold a cellphone in order to look at a map, a state appeals court ruled Wednesday. Bob Egelko in the San Francisco Chronicle -- 06/05/25

 

Wednesday 6/4

Regulators seek to phase out gas-powered appliances in Southern California -- If adopted, the rules would phase out the sale of gas-powered furnaces and water heaters in the region. Officials say the plan is crucial for reducing air pollution and improving public health, while opponents fear higher consumer costs. Hayley Smith in the Los Angeles Times -- 06/04/25

It’s expensive to become a teacher in California. This bill would pay those who try -- To earn a teaching credential, students are required to complete a one-year program combining coursework and 600 hours of classroom experience. A new bill would provide money to pay them for that work. Carolyn Jones Calmatters -- 06/04/25

 

Tuesday 6/3

Judge dismisses Gavin Newsom’s lawsuit challenging Trump tariffs — for now -- U.S. District Court Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley ruled on Monday that Newsom and Attorney General Rob Bonta did not have jurisdiction to sue Trump in the Northern District of California. In doing so, she partially sided with the U.S. Department of Justice’s assertion that the case belonged in the New York-based Court of International Trade. Lia Russell in the Sacramento Bee Dustin Gardiner Politico -- 06/03/25

What EPA’s gutting of environmental grants means for Southern California communities -- The grants were dedicated for projects meant to improve minority communities impacted by pollution, climate change and air and water quality issues. Ryan Carter, Kaitlyn Schallhorn in the Orange County Register -- 06/03/25

 

Monday 6/2

After half a century, California legislators on the verge of overhauling a landmark environmental law -- Long celebrated and derided, the California Environmental Quality Act is facing its strongest overhaul in generations. Buoyed by national criticism that the state can no longer build sufficient housing and public infrastructure, Gov. Gavin Newsom and lawmakers said now is the time for major changes. Liam Dillon in the Los Angeles Times -- 06/02/25

Millions of Californians will need to change how they landscape their homes -- Californians living in fire-prone areas can expect to make radical changes to the landscaping surrounding their homes in the coming years. Impending state rules will focus on what's called Zone Zero, which is the defensible space that extends 5 feet from the outer walls of a house or from the edge of an attached wood deck. Julie Johnson and Stephanie Zhu in the San Francisco Chronicle -- 06/02/25

 

Weekend 6/1-5/31

After nearly 6,000 California prisoners falsely tested positive for opioids, officials launch sweeping review -- The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is reviewing hundreds of state parole hearings to see if any inmates who were denied parole were rejected because of faulty drug tests. Salvador Hernandez in the Los Angeles Times -- 06/01/25

Gov. Newsom proposes ‘asset test’ for low-income and disabled Medi-Cal applicants. What does that mean? -- Facing higher healthcare costs, Gov. Gavin Newsom is proposing adding an “asset test” for applicants for Medi-Cal and In-Home Supportive Services. The test would mean Californians would not be eligible if their assets total more than $2,000. Karen Garcia in the Los Angeles Times -- 05/31/25

 
dotted line
 
For more information regarding County of Orange Legislative Affairs, please email at LegAffairs@ocgov.com.
 
Copyright 2025 County of Orange, California