|
Prepared by Precision Advocacy
Amid a slow stream of new bill introductions, the state budget continues to be a major preoccupation for the administration and legislative leadership - in particular, the recent actions of the Trump administration.
On January 27, President Donald Trump’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued a memo to the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies, requiring agencies to identify and review all federal financial assistance programs and supporting activities consistent with the President’s policies and requirements.
In response to the memo, Attorney General Rob Bonta, along with 22 other Democratic state attorneys general, filed a fresh lawsuit challenging the funding freeze and asking a court to block the action. A host of nonprofit organizations also filed suit prior to the state attorneys general, prompting a federal judge to put a temporary hold on the funding freeze minutes before it was scheduled to take effect. The judge called it a “brief administrative stay” to maintain the status quo through Friday while court challenges proceed.
Elected officials and staff are still grappling with the real and potential impacts of President Trump’s chaos-inducing executive order. On Wednesday, the White House issued a memo that appeared to rescind the funding freeze, with the White House Press Secretary later stating that the White House merely rescinded the memo, but not the funding freeze.
We will continue to follow and report on developments as well as impacts to the state and county.
Legislative Analyst’s Office Report on California’s High Electricity Rates
The Legislative Analysts Office (LAO) recently released a report on electricity rates in California. The report discusses the reasons why California has the second highest electricity rates in the country, behind Hawaii, with a trajectory to continue growing at a faster pace than rates in the rest of the country. The report points to significant and increasing wildfire‑related costs, the state’s ambitious greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction programs and policies, and differences in utility operational structures and services territories as the big drivers behind the high rates.
The report also highlights how electricity prices challenge the state’s ambitious greenhouse gas targets. High electricity prices tend to disincentivize consumers from buying electric cars and other appliances over models that rely on fossil fuels. The LAO warns that the legislature will likely confront difficult decisions about how to approach electricity rates in order to best support its varied goals, including balancing the desires to both mitigate and adapt to climate change as well as preserve affordability.
The Electricity Landscape California’s electricity landscape is somewhat complex and includes both heavily regulated investor-owned utilities and publicly owned utilities. Roughly three‑quarters of statewide electricity is distributed in investor-owned utility service territories, which cover the bulk of the state’s land area, including PG&E and Southern California Edison which serves Orange County. About a quarter of the state’s population is served by publicly owned utilities like Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD).
In areas with investor-owned utilities, community choice aggregators (CCAs) act as load serving entities and are responsible for the generation portion of the electricity provided to customers, while the investor-owned utilities continue to be responsible for the transmission and distribution parts of the system. Investor-owned utilities (IOU) also provide meter reading, billing, and maintenance services for CCA customers. CCAs have grown in recent years as more local communities have sought to expand consumer choices available to their residents; 25 now operate in various regions of the state. Currently, nearly 40% of the electricity consumed in IOU territories is purchased through CCAs. In Orange County, the Orange County Power Authority, launched in 2022, acts as a CCA.
Electricity that load serving entities sell to consumers is largely generated by power plants and renewable energy sites with some owned by the load serving entity themselves and others being operated by other private companies. Some generation also comes from smaller scale sources like rooftop solar.
Electricity Rate Setting For investor-owned utilities, electricity rates are set by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). Every four years, the CPUC authorizes a utility’s rates through what is known as a General Rate Case proceeding. The CPUC also conducts a variety of other types of proceedings, including the determination of the rate of return a utility is authorized to receive (known as a Cost of Capital proceeding) and how much it should be compensated for purchasing fuel and power (known as an Energy Resources Recovery Account proceeding).
Publicly owned utility and CCA electricity rates are set by local governing boards. For publicly owned utilities, the utility’s governing board, consisting of local elected officials, set the rates. Under a similar model, local governing boards typically oversee the rates that CCAs charge their customers for electricity generation and purchases.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission generally oversees the transmission portion of electricity rates, as transmission infrastructure can cross state lines.
Electricity Rate Structure The structure of electricity rates for consumers vary between the type of electricity provider and several other factors. Fixed and variable costs may be charged as a flat fee or be rolled into rate based charges based on volume used. Lower income consumers may also qualify for reduced rate programs depending on their provider.
Consumers with solar panels who participate in net metering programs and joined prior to April 2023, do not typically pay a share of the utility’s fixed costs, and those costs are shifted to other electricity consumers. After April 2023, the state’s new net metering rules kicked in, which shift some fixed costs back to new rooftop solar customers. While rooftop solar customers benefit from the fixed investments in the grid, solar industry advocates argue that the now lower compensation rate for rooftop solar electricity generation makes installation of solar less financially attractive to consumers.
Comparing Electricity Rates Average electricity rates in California are close to double the national average. Californians’ residential electricity rates vary widely across the state, depending on which utility provides their service. On average, California investor-owned utility electricity rates are more than 50% higher than rates charged by their publicly owned counterparts. In some cases, the differences in rates between individual utilities are quite stark, even within similar geographic areas. For example, PG&E’s residential electricity rates for a typical market rate customer are more than double SMUD’s rates—so customers in Sacramento pay notably less for a comparable level of service compared to their neighbors in nearby Davis. Similarly, in the southern part of the state, Southern California Edison’s residential electricity rates for a typical market rate customer are more than 70% higher than LADWP’s rates. Accordingly, customers in the portions of Culver City that are served by LADWP pay significantly less for electricity than those who live in the portions of the city served by Southern California Edison.
In general, average residential electricity rates in California have grown faster than inflation in recent years, rising by about 47% over the four‑year period from 2019 through 2023 compared to overall growth in prices of about 18%. This is particularly true for the state’s three large investor-owned utilities. Over the same four‑year period, PG&E, Southern California Edison, and San Diego Gas & Electric average rates have increased 48-67%.
Key Factors Driving Higher Rates The LAO points to several key categories of factors that likely are driving these higher rates particularly for investor-owned utilities including: wildfire‑related costs, GHG reduction programs and policies, and differences in utility operational structures and services territories.
Electricity rates reflect the costs of implementing various state GHG reduction policies to encourage utilities to use cleaner sources of electricity. For example, one of the key programs aimed at shifting the state’s mix of energy sources is the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), which requires utilities to provide a certain percentage of retail electricity sales from renewable generation. While the costs of generating electricity from renewable resources have declined in recent years, this transition still has added costs for ratepayers.
In addition to contributing to somewhat higher generation costs, renewable sources of electricity often require additional investments in other infrastructure for transmission and reliability, which can be costly. For example, utility‑scale renewable generation sites frequently are located in remote areas that require new or upgraded transmission lines to reach. Additionally, renewable sources of electricity often are more intermittent than fossil fuel‑powered sources, and sources such as solar often generate electricity at times when it is relatively plentiful. Accordingly, as the share of electricity generated from these sources has increased, the state has had to take steps—such as preserving the availability of natural gas‑powered plants to operate when needed and increasing investments in battery storage—to ensure that adequate electricity supplies are available to meet demand at all times. The amount that the costs of these activities have contributed to rates is uncertain.
California ratepayers not only pay for activities associated with shifting to more renewable sources of electricity, but also bear other costs related to supporting the state’s efforts to meet its GHG targets. The LAO estimates that in 2023, about 4% of average rates for the large investor-owned utilities was used for supporting climate‑related activities.
The LAO report explores other structural issues that may contribute to higher utility costs. Investor-owned utilities must generate a profit for shareholders and do not benefit from tax exempt borrowing that publicly owned utilities do. Service territories also differ, with companies like PG&E that serve a large distributed rural population and carry higher fixed costs as a result.
Impacts of High Energy Prices High electricity rates, particularly volumetric charges, make it costlier for Californians to use electricity. This has the potential to encourage electricity conservation, such as by wasting less and potentially switching to more efficient appliances. This, in turn, has environmental benefits since electricity generation often results in environmental impacts, including the emission of GHGs.
However, very high electricity rates can lead to a decrease in beneficial electricity uses such as cooling for necessary health reasons and transition to electric cars and appliances.
Key Emerging Issues That May Affect Electricity Rates and Legislative Decisions
- Increasing stringency of GHG emission reduction requirements for the electricity grid
- Accommodating more electricity demand from electrification
- Growing demands for funding to pay for programs aimed at supporting state climate policies
- Continuing wildfire‑related costs
- Trade‑offs related to fixed charges for investor‑owned utility customers
High electricity rates in California continue to put a strain on consumers across the state, particularly those with low incomes or who live in hotter parts of the state. The LAO writes that the legislature will likely confront difficult decisions about how to approach electricity rates in order to best support its goals, including balancing the desire to both mitigate and adapt to climate change as well as preserve affordability.
Governor’s Press Releases
Below is a list of the governor’s press releases beginning January 22.
January 28: Governor Newsom announces appointments 1.28.25
- Deborah Hoffman, of Sacramento, has been appointed Chief Deputy Director at the Office of Tax Appeals
- Krista Dunzweiler, of Sacramento, has been appointed Chief Deputy General Counsel in the Office of Legal Affairs at the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
- Todd Gloria, of San Diego, has been appointed to the California Air Resources Board
- Roxanne Messina Captor, of Redondo Beach, has been reappointed to the California Arts Council
January 28: Governor Newsom meets with leaders of Kehillat Israel, Palisades synagogue that still stands after fire
January 28: TODAY: Governor Newsom, Magic Johnson, and Casey Wasserman to announce details of ‘LA Rises’ initiative
January 28: Governor Newsom announces LA Rises, a private-sector initiative led by Mark Walter, Earvin “Magic” Johnson and Casey Wasserman, to support swift and unified rebuilding of Los Angeles
January 27: Hear the experts give the real facts on California water
January 27: On Holocaust Remembrance Day, Governor Newsom’s Council on Holocaust and Genocide Education releases findings and recommendations
January 27: Governor Newsom cuts red tape, further suspends Coastal Commission rules to help LA firestorm survivors rebuild
January 25: Governor Newsom announces appointments 1.25.25
- Bret Ladine, of Sacramento, has been appointed Director of the Financial Information System for California (FI$Cal)
- Alicia Fowler, of Sacramento, has been appointed General Counsel at the California State Transportation Agency
- Basem Muallem, of Chino Hills, has been appointed Statewide Regional Director at the California High-Speed Rail Authority
- Christy Bouma, of Sacramento, has been appointed to the Fair Access to Insurance Requirements (F.A.I.R) Plan Governing Committee
January 24: Working together for fire survivors, Governor Newsom welcomes President Trump to Los Angeles
January 24: Here’s all the actions Governor Newsom has taken in response to the Los Angeles fires
January 24: Governor Newsom meets with frontline firefighters battling unprecedented Los Angeles firestorms
January 23: Governor Newsom signs $2.5 billion bipartisan relief package to help Los Angeles recover and rebuild faster from firestorm
January 23: TODAY: Alongside legislative and local leaders, Governor Newsom to sign $2.5 billion relief package for Los Angeles
January 23: Governor Newsom proclaims Ed Roberts Day 2025
January 23: California refuerza los Centros de Recuperación de Desastres para ayudar a los sobrevivientes de los incendios de Los Ángeles en línea y en persona
January 23: California bolsters Disaster Recovery Centers to help Los Angeles firestorm survivors online and in-person
January 23: Governor Newsom announces commitments from state banks and credit unions to provide mortgage relief for firestorm survivors
|