|
Feb. 1, 2013
· Preventing $57M Farm Tax Increase
· Improving Child Protection
Preventing $57M Farm Tax Increase
On Tuesday, the Senate approved Senate Bill 319 to prevent an
estimated $57 million property tax increase on Indiana farmers.
SB 319 would delay, for an additional year,
the
implementation of a new federal formula for assessing farmland property
taxes. This means the formula used for the March 1, 2011, assessment
date will
be used again for the March 1, 2013, assessment date.
This legislation is all about helping the 62,000
farmers and their families in our state. The new proposed "soil productivity
factors" for farmland assessment could cause an 18 percent average increase in property tax payments for
these residents, depending on which counties they call home.
I’m afraid that could be enough to put some of
our hard-working farmers — who are already struggling because of last year’s
drought — out of business. That is why I supported SB 319, which will now be heard in the House of Representatives.
|
Improving Child Services
Indiana has made important gains in protecting Hoosier children from
abuse and neglect since the Department of Child Services was created in 2005,
but there is still work to do. Tragic news reports and comments from local
officials and constituents have made it clear to all state leaders that certain
changes are necessary to improve DCS.
This week the Indiana Senate unanimously approved Senate
Bill 105 to allow for more direct communication between local DCS offices
and professionals who work with children. The bill would allow any law
enforcement official, judiciary employee, medical professional or school
official to report suspected cases of child abuse or neglect directly to local DCS
caseworkers rather than to the statewide child abuse hotline based in
Indianapolis.
This
change will reduce caller wait times and give local caseworkers the freedom to
respond to reports from professionals without having to wait for direction from
Indianapolis.
SB
105 now moves to the House of Representatives for further consideration.
|
|
|